MFROG
Home
Forums
FGRV Map
Calendar
Donations
Tutorials
Solar
Winterizing
Winter Camping
Buyers Check List
Energy Systems /
Efficiency Ratings
Resources
Document Center
Helpful-Links
 
Molded Lightweight Fiberglass RV
STORE | FGRV Map | ALBUMS | FORUMS | HOME

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Replacing an Axle - leading arm to trailing arm, plus adding brakes (long post)
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 12:49 PM
Post #1


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



Background

We bought our 1972 boler American knowing it needed a lot of work to restore it. Our trailer tracked fine during the initial 10 hour drive to its new home even though we thought it sat a little low. We had a big trip planned two months down the road and had a lot of work to do. We did what we could, when we could, where we could. New tires were installed while at Bolerama 2006 and they scrubbed the wheel wells on the way home. Link to tire change post.

With less than 10 days to go before our big trip, we knew we had to do something before we left. We got a local welding shop to cut off the old axle, – weld 2x2” square tubing to the underside of the frame and weld the axle back on. It was a cheap quick fix that worked not only for the trip, but also for the next year or so while I researched axles here and elsewhere on the web. There was a lot to learn about axles and a lot of varying opinions to filter through.

On the way home from our 1st big trip we came within inches of T boning a police cruiser as it came flying through an intersection against the lights. I distinctly remember the wide open eyes of the officer in the passenger side of the cruiser as he watched the front of my truck bearing down on him. The sound of squealing tires competing with the siren. Carol Ann remembers the faint single thank you wave as I finally stopped as the officer’s window passed her side of the truck. Once the adrenaline rush was over and the heart rate came down to normal my mind switched from uttering a flow of expletives to proclaiming the trailer was getting electric brakes if at all possible.

Once home we started to learn more about torsion axles. We compared our trailer to lots of pictures on the web, then read many posts on what others have done. Our 34 year old trailer showed all of the following:

1. Low riding appearance

2. Less than 3” clearance from top of tire to wheel well

3. Tire marks on wheel well

4. Minimal torsion movement in axle with “bumper bounce test”

5. Things bouncing around in the trailer, jumping out of cupboards etc.

6. Uneven tire wear

All this led us to believe we still had the original axle that needed replacing.

Comparing the specs for both Dexter and Flexride (2200 Lb axles) at the recommended down angles (10 and 24 degrees respectively) both provide for about 3.25” (+/- 0.1”) of movement of the spindle between no load and shock load. Dexter has a little more movement between no load and loaded, that is trailer off the ground and trailer setting on the ground. Dexter is at 2.34” and Flexride at 1.69”.

The spindle should drop about 2” when you jack up the trailer. When setting down on the wheels the trailer should have about 1.25” of movement between the body of the trailer and the top of the rim if somebody is jumping up and down on the bumper. If these numbers are out of whack, chances are your axle needs replacing.

Another way to check to see if your trailer is riding low is to level the trailer on level ground using the tongue crank and no jacks. Then measure the height from the ground to the floor at the door and compare that to the specs for your trailer. For the boler American, total height is specified at 6’ 11”, inside height 6’ 1” giving a difference of 10”. That should equal the height of the floor at the door.

There are a great number of discussions on leading arm vs. trailing arm configurations for these trailers. Many of our trailers came with the leading arms which have worked well over the years. Today the axle manufacturers recommend the trailing arm configuration. There are some reports of manufacturers saying that a leading arm is still OK. Consensus for leading arms seems to indicate that a low down start angle to up angle is what is recommended and that a high down angle be avoided.

Some have reported using brakes on a leading arm arrangement. This usually requires switching the brakes to the opposite side since brakes are left and right handed and all axles are currently manufactured on assembly lines to be trailing arms. For our trailer I chose to install a new trailing arm axle with electric brakes. I felt this would be the safest and that it could be done without major modifications to the frame.

Changing to a trailing arm, requires raising the trailer about 3.5” to allow the main bar of the axle to be located under the dropped kitchen floor rather than behind it. Raising the trailer can alter the center of gravity of the trailer making it more unstable side to side. I tried to keep the amount of rise to a minimum for stability, appearance, function and towing considerations. By using the smaller diameter tire and zero degree angle the net change was more in the line of 2.5” higher than stock. Considering the trailer had probably settled 2.5” over the last 36 years, the net change was approximately 5”. Raising the trailer also reduced the air dam effect experienced in towing with my 4x4 Ranger.

In all honesty, it was a complex decision to make. I had to put all the specs for the various axle manufacturers into a spread sheet to compare the final ride heights and space under the wheel wells to accommodate the movement of the tire and axle. I then added various tire and rim dimensions into the spreadsheet to find the best match for my wants and needs. Keep in mind the original 6.00 – 13” tires are no longer available.

Many of the Bolers and its descendants have the body offset from the center of the frame by an inch towards the street. Some have stated that this is to balance the weight from side to side. I do not think that is the case because the side with the greatest weight is furthest from the frame. I feel this was done to maximize floor space by keeping the frame as close to the curbside closet as possible. The wider kitchen counter allows for the frame to be set further in without affecting floor space.

This in turn keeps the curbside of the trailer more in line with the passenger side of the tow vehicle, while the streetside extends further out from the TV. The end result is the wheel and tire end up closer to the outer body on the curbside than on street side.

How I did this will follow in the next few posts.


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 12:56 PM
Post #2


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



This is what our trailer looked like when we picked it up.
Attached File  BeforeC.JPG ( 36.64K ) Number of downloads: 80
Attached File  BeforeS.JPG ( 33.23K ) Number of downloads: 49


It sits quite a bit lower than the one shown in this 1976 brochure. Note the position of the tire and rims to the body.
Attached File  Brochure.jpg ( 55.16K ) Number of downloads: 86


The original axle has the following information plate welded to it:
Attached File  ID_TAG.JPG ( 23.89K ) Number of downloads: 63


Which reads:
INGERSOLL RUB-R-RIDE
MFG. UNDER NEIDHART PAT.
CAPACITY 1200 LBS.

The tag on the trailer lists the weight at 850 Lbs. with a maximum gross weight of 1250 Lbs. Note the trailer is rated higher than the axle. It is known that the early trailers were understated for weights with actual weights coming in at 1000 Lbs or more empty. It is not too hard to put in over 200 Lbs in gear. These axles probably spent their entire life at or over their rated capacity. Below on the left is a picture of the axle from another boler American, on the right mine.
Attached File  Spindle1.jpg ( 46.79K ) Number of downloads: 80
Attached File  Spindle2.jpg ( 38K ) Number of downloads: 103


Both axles are positioned higher than what I believe was initially a zero degree start angle. That is the arm should be parallel with the frame under load. Mine on the right was quite a bit higher.

Continued …


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 01:03 PM
Post #3


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



The quick fix.

The tire on the left was the original 6.00-13, the middle the P165/70R13 car tire that was on the trailer when we got it and the tire on the right a ST 175/80R13, the recommended replacement ST trailer tire.
Attached File  All3.jpg ( 36.51K ) Number of downloads: 46


In hindsight it is quite easy to understand why the trailer tires scrubbed when I installed them. My torsion arms of the old axle had the spindles located about 2” higher to the wheel well, and the larger tire added another inch. There goes my recommended 3” clearance and the tires would scrub over bumps in the road.

The quick fix was to weld a 2x2” square tube between the frame and the axle.

Attached File  Raise1.jpg ( 54.29K ) Number of downloads: 67
Attached File  Raise2.jpg ( 49.32K ) Number of downloads: 107


I didn’t notice this until composing this post, but the picture on the right shows the bent torsion arm and spindle. Note how the top of the tire is canted inwards where is should be canted out. No wonder I got such excessive tire wear on the curbside tire.

The temporary quick fix raised the trailer making it look a little more like it should and stopped the new tires from scrubbing.
Attached File  curb_lift.jpg ( 32.96K ) Number of downloads: 62
Attached File  street_lift.jpg ( 34.98K ) Number of downloads: 65


Though it still does not look like the trailer is sitting high enough, it did get us through a 3 week trip to the East Coast and the better part of 2 ½ years till we could get the new axle installed.

Continued …


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 01:12 PM
Post #4


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



The final modification …
· changed the axle from a leading arm, to a trailing arm configuration

· centered the axle under the body instead of the frame.

· Raised the body a little more and

· added electric brakes.

The challenge was getting everything to fit just right.

After a lot of research, measuring and calculating I came up with this diagram of a cross section of the trailer through the wheel wells.
Attached File  Axle_design.gif ( 10.52K ) Number of downloads: 172


The diagram below from Red Neck Trailer provides some clues as to the clearance required for the electric brake drums.
Attached File  Dexter.gif ( 5.9K ) Number of downloads: 129


The original hub face to hub face was 64”, allowing a minimum of 6” for each drum leaves 52” between the drums and less than an inch clearance on the curbside if I was to center the axle under the body. So I chose to go for a 64.5” hub face to give that extra room. The key to shifting the axle was to move the mounting brackets ½” curbside from center. Dexter Engineers said it could be done but the assembly line said they couldn’t.

The decision was made to space the mounting brackets 1” more and change the streetside rectangular steel to 3” wide and this would shift the axle over the ½” required centering it under the body. I then used a spreadsheet to compare various axle angles in combination with various tire/rim combinations to get a final hitch height between 17” and 18”. The best combination came from using a Carlisle premounted ST145/R12 and a Dexter Torflex axle with the following specifications:

Dexter # 9 Torflex rated at 2200 Lbs.

7” Electric brakes 5 on 4.5” hub with EZ lube

Standard inboard mount with hanger kit

0 degree

50” to Outside of Brackets

64.5” Hub Face

This is what the frame looks like once the axle has been removed.
Attached File  street_frame.jpg ( 33.12K ) Number of downloads: 120


Streetside
Attached File  curb_frame.jpg ( 43.23K ) Number of downloads: 85


Curbside

When it came time to weld, the welder did not have any 3x4” rectangular tubing for the streetside, so we used a 2” wide and left the streetside bracket overhanging by ½” from the frame extension. The metal was cut a little longer than the length of the axle mounting brackets, flaring out 45 degrees to the frame on either side. The wheels were put onto the axle and the lifts clamped onto the mounting brackets. The entire assembly was lifted into place. A notch was cut into the center U Channel under the floor to allow for the axles camber and everything was checked for the correct positioning and alignment before welding into place.
Attached File  Center_Notch.jpg ( 61.58K ) Number of downloads: 168


The notch is just above the welders head shown above.

And a close up below.
Attached File  Close_center.jpg ( 118.52K ) Number of downloads: 109


Continued …


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 01:20 PM
Post #5


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



Streetside view
Attached File  streetside.jpg ( 48.76K ) Number of downloads: 106


And Curbside view:
Attached File  Curbside.jpg ( 45.64K ) Number of downloads: 82


The angle on the curbside closest to the door had to be notched for the frame support.
This is best seen looking from inside the frame as shown below:
Attached File  Curb_notch.jpg ( 61.79K ) Number of downloads: 145


A little closer view
Attached File  Close_up.jpg ( 56.83K ) Number of downloads: 99


And as viewed from the outside
Attached File  curb_detail.jpg ( 51.74K ) Number of downloads: 78


Continued …


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 01:30 PM
Post #6


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



The size difference between tires is shown below. The final ST 145/R12 is on the left, the original 6.00-13 in the middle and its recommended replacement the ST175/80R13 is on the right.
Attached File  tire_profile.JPG ( 59.94K ) Number of downloads: 35


Once everything was installed this is how the trailer looks.
Attached File  final_curb.jpg ( 73.41K ) Number of downloads: 92
Attached File  post_height.jpg ( 35.81K ) Number of downloads: 73



The trailer feels and sounds like it has less resistance towing now that it is a little higher. Things no longer fly around on the inside while towing. I can definitely feel a big difference in stopping with the electric brakes. I am not as scared about having to stop fast while driving. It is a major reduction in stress.

The axle with brakes cost a little over $400 CDN including taxes. Installation $300 CDN, 3 new tires and rims about $300 more. Total cost was just over $1000 CDN plus a few hundred hours of researching, measuring and planning.

You can read about the entire chronological restoration of our trailer here.


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raya L.
post Apr 5 2009, 01:30 PM
Post #7


Member
Location: Mid-Atlantic
RV Type:1974 Boler 13 (Neonex/Winnipeg)



Roy,

This is great information - thank you for taking the time to post it so well Thanx.gif

(Quick note about the 1250# gross weight vs. the 1200# axle capacity: I bet they were subtracting the 50# difference for the "unsprung" weight of the axle itself. Of course that's still under-rated for how most people load their trailers; I'm just noting where the "missing" 50# might have come in.)

Looking forward to the rest...

Raya

Edited to add that that the axle, rims, and tires would probably be more than 50# in actuality - probably closer to 200#? So that "gives" a bit more favor to the lower axle rating as compared to the actual trailer weight. (Sheesh, it's hard to explain what I mean!)

This post has been edited by Raya L.: Apr 5 2009, 07:44 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pete Dumbleton
post Apr 5 2009, 07:04 PM
Post #8


Member
Location: Washington
RV Type:Scamp



I agree with Raya about the 'missing' 50 lbs. Nice job of replacement and documentation!


--------------------
Pete Dumbleton
'91 Scamp 13' & '98 Ranger 4.0L 4WD pickup
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 5 2009, 08:25 PM
Post #9


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



I thank both of you.


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raya L.
post Apr 5 2009, 09:22 PM
Post #10


Member
Location: Mid-Atlantic
RV Type:1974 Boler 13 (Neonex/Winnipeg)



Your Boler sure looks perky with the new axle!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alf S.
post Apr 6 2009, 01:57 AM
Post #11


Member
Location: North shore of Lake Erie
RV Type:'07 Escape 5.0 & '02 GMC Tug



Hi: Roy in TO... Looks like the new axle has given you quite a "lift". Do you need a step stool to get in now???
Alf S. North shore of Lake Erie 4.gif


--------------------
Escape Artists!!!"Finding our way out"
Red Green: "I'm a man I can change...if I have too"
Red Green: "Remember I'm pullin' fer Ya; we're all in this together"
"The more we know, the more we know we don't KNOW!!!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrew Gibbens
post Apr 6 2009, 03:06 AM
Post #12


Member
Location: England
RV Type:



QUOTE (Raya L. @ Apr 5 2009, 09:30 PM) *
I bet they were subtracting the 50# difference for the "unsprung" weight of the axle itself.

More likely it was the tongue weight that made the difference - 1250lb gross trailer weight less, say, 150lb tongue weight is 1100lb, so well within the 1200lb axle rating.

Andrew

This post has been edited by Andrew Gibbens: Apr 6 2009, 03:08 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carol Ann in TO
post Apr 6 2009, 04:03 AM
Post #13


Member
Location: Toronto
RV Type:'72 Boler American



QUOTE (Alf S. @ Apr 6 2009, 05:57 AM) *
Hi: Roy in TO... Looks like the new axle has given you quite a "lift". Do you need a step stool to get in now???
Alf S. North shore of Lake Erie 4.gif


Alf: now that you mention it, I remember "tripping" into the trailer on the first trip away with the new axle. 53.gif

Carol Ann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill D
post Apr 6 2009, 05:21 AM
Post #14


Member
Location: wild wonderful WV
RV Type:home built teardrop,Uhaul & Scamp



With all the time cutting, welding and measuring, is there any reason one couldn't fab some kind of spring hangers and install a regular axle with leaf springs? (just thinking out loud) Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roy in TO
post Apr 6 2009, 06:35 AM
Post #15


Member
Location: Toronto, ON
RV Type:'72 Boler American



QUOTE (Bill D @ Apr 6 2009, 09:21 AM) *
is there any reason one couldn't fab some kind of spring hangers and install a regular axle with leaf springs?


3 thoughts come to mind.
Since the kitchen floor is 3" lower than the bottom of the frame you would have to raise the trailer a little too high to get everything to work under the trailer with a straight axle.
If you used a "drop" axle (the spindles are higher than the axle), ground clearance would be in the 4-6" range.
3rd reason is that the frame ends at the door. One may not have enough room for shackles unless you are using really short springs.


--------------------
Owning a trashed trailer does not make one trailer trash.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 08:42 PM