QUOTE (Byron Kinnaman @ Jun 4 2007, 11:02 PM)

Looks like my guess about the low power efficiency was pretty darn close.
Check this pdf file out. 500 Watt inverter, efficiency starts going down the tube at 50 Watt output (10%).
You have a different concept of "down the tube" than I do. It looks to me like the efficiency is pretty darn close to flat linear throughout the entire range after 50w... Very inefficient up to about 30w with a no-load idle draw of 5-6watts which is about 500mA. The graph doesn't have enough resolution but it looks like the efficiency drops by about 7 percent fairly linearly from 50w to 500w. That's not really "down the tube" is it?
Gina says her battery dies "WAY quicker" if she's using the 400w inverter to run her computer than if she's using the 100w inverter. She either has a crap 400W inverter, has a different definition of "WAY quicker" than we do, or her test wasn't scientific.
There's a lot of things one can do to affect the power consumption of a laptop. Whether or not your wireless antenna is turned on, bluetooth, screen brightness, cpu speed profile, playing a movie from a DVD instead of disk, playing a game... I'd be willing to bet there was a difference in the usage or setup of the laptop between her two tests..
I just can not accept that as a general rule, big inverters are _significantly_ less efficient at low draw than a small linverter at high draw... In fact, if this graph is typical of inverter efficiency, then her 100w inverter should have been less efficient at the upper end of its load than her 400w inverter and hence, she should have seen the reverse happen.
If, after a scientific test, Gina finds that her 400w inverter really does suck down her batteries at a much higher rate than the same load on her 100w inverter, I would probably find her 400w inverter faulty.