17 ft size towing? - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×

Go Back   Fiberglass RV > Fiberglass RV Community Forums > General Chat
Click Here to Login
Register Registry FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-30-2006, 01:23 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 78 Scamp 13 ft
Posts: 118
My husband and I are REALLY anxious to get nice little camper for the two of us and begin to do a lot of weekend travel... we've gotten all the kids out of the house finally and we look forward to this!!

I am excited about these little type campers!! We reject the idea of a bigger type since we do NOT want to have to park in the RV "parking lot' sections of campgrounds! We actually like to CAMP sort of, in quiet, and not have our entire house with us!

Anyways- just what size vehicle does one really need to tow a 17/16ft Scamp, for instance? A 13ft? I have my eye on a 13ft one near us for sale- and I think I ought to grab it quickly.

We currently own 4 cylinder Saturns..... but we can upgrade no problem. I am really hoping a 6 cylinder car would be okay.
Deb in MN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 01:46 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Donna D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 1988 16 ft Scamp Deluxe
Posts: 25,711
Welcome to FiberglassRV Debra, we're glad you found us.

You get lots of help on this forum to your questions.

I'll start by saying, check your owners manual for your vehicle and see what the stated towing weight may be...other's will jump in.

PS: I tow a 16' Scamp Deluxe with a 5.4 litre V8 Ford F-150, needlessly to say...towing is not a problem

__________________
Donna D.
Ten Forward - 2014 Escape 5.0 TA
Double Yolk - 1988 16' Scamp Deluxe
Donna D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 02:52 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Trailer: Burro 17 ft Widebody
Posts: 868
Registry
Hi Debra,

From my limited experience (6 yrs and towing) the majority of 16 or 17 footers can be towed with a vehicle that has a 3500lb tow limit, with a tranny cooler and tow package, naturally.
Our Odyssey has that limit, and we have gone back and forth across the country a couple of times with no problems so far. Two important advantages of a minivan: long wheelbase (don't underestimate this one for stability) and good gas mileage as a daily driver (I get 25.7 mpg overall on the highway when not towing). The room in it makes it easy to keep the trailer free of unnecessary clutter too.
It sounds like you approach camping very much like we do.
Per Walthinsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 03:53 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Roger H's Avatar
 
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
Welcome to the Forums!

I have a Scamp 16' custom deluxe (with the wood interior). I've towed with various trucks, most of them V6s. I currently tow with an '02 Tundra 3.4l V6 auto 4WD. I second that if you're planning to buy a vehicle, buy one with at least a 3500 lb tow rating. That will pretty much ensure that you'll be able to tow any of the offerings from Scamp, Casita, Burro, and most of the other now-defuct companies. Bigfoot requires a little more oomph as they're a lot heavier.

Roger
Roger H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 04:56 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Frederick L. Simson's Avatar
 
Trailer: Fiber Stream 1978 / Honda Odyssey LX 2003
Posts: 8,222
Registry
Send a message via AIM to Frederick L. Simson
Talking

Quote:
We currently own 4 cylinder Saturns..... but we can upgrade no problem. I am really hoping a 6 cylinder [b]car would be okay.
Like Per, I also tow with a Honda Odyssey. I know of others who tow with Toyota Sienna or Dodge/Crysler Caravan. Look at the spec sheets carefully.

I spent a lot of time looking at the Saturn L300 Wagon with a V6, but had to abort that purchase when I discovered that it's tow rating was still only [b]1000 pounds. Not all 6 cylinder cars have the same capability.

The [b]V8 Ford Thunderbird (wouldn't that be cool!) is also only rated to tow [b]1000 pounds!

Don't rely on engine size alone to figure on towing capacity.
__________________
Frederick - The Scaleman
Frederick L. Simson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 05:07 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Brian B-P's Avatar
 
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
My combination is a 17' Boler and Toyota Sienna van, which is very similar to Per's Odyssey.

I would suggest the following:
  • Ignore the number of engine cylinders. The engine power is somewhat important, but counting cylinders doesn't mean much. The Cummins in the big Dodge pickups is a 6-cylinder, most Ferraris have 8 cylinders, and we know which one tows better...
  • Pay attention to the tow vehicle's ratings from the manufacturer - they have reasons for setting those limits. For fiberglass trailers 16' and up, that means more than 2000 lb, and the next common rating is 3500 lb, the level which Roger mentioned.
  • Pay attention to all of the limits. If a tow vehicle can handle the trailer you want, but not while carrying any passengers (because the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating is not high enough, for instance), then it isn't much good. Auto maker web sites rarely give these specs - it's time to visit a dealer, get the brochures (for trucks there's usually a special towing guide), and even read owner's manuals before making a final choice.
  • Get the right equipment. The transmission coolers and similar components in tow packages are required to reach the ratings, and things like pre-wiring packages make setup easier.
  • Consider realistic trailer weights. Even 13' eggs don't weight 850 lb in use (as some people might claim), and highly-equipped larger units (even aside from the large Bigfoot models) can push the 3500 lb limit of a typical "mini"van. Search this forum for "weight"... there's lots of information here.
In general (and we all know generalizations are just a starting point) long wheelbase is good, and long rear overhang (distance from rear axle to bumper) is bad.

The reality of today's automotive market is that vehicles with sufficient towing capacity will more likely be in a tall wagon (called SUV to be trendy) format, rather than a sedan, although they can still be a reasonable size and decently economical.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 07:22 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Trailer: Burro 17 ft Widebody
Posts: 868
Registry
I should have mentioned that the Ody has a 118" wheelbase (good for comparison). I echo Frederick's admonition to check the specs carefully: I found the Ody to have a surprisingly tight turning radius, and I wouldn't want to bore you with tales of when that came in handy bordering on crucial.
Per Walthinsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 10:21 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
CharlynnT's Avatar
 
Trailer: Boler 17 ft
Posts: 510
Debra,

Buy the trailer now, take it on a few weekends, decide if you need a bigger tow vehicle later.

Welcome!

We had a Nissan XTerra then decided on a GMC Silverado, but we carry a lot of scuba gear, etc. in the truck.

Char
CharlynnT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2006, 11:47 PM   #9
Administrator
 
Mary F's Avatar
 
Trailer: Casita 1999 17 ft Liberty Deluxe
Posts: 10,948
Registry
Debra, Check out the Show us your Rigs topic. Many of the photos are of tow vehicle and trailer. You should be able to get lots of ideas on how folks travel (and what the different trailers look like, too!)

Of course, the albums have pics of many different trailers as well...

But for tow vehicles, go to Show us your Rigs.
__________________
Mary F Fiberglass Rules!
________________________________
FGRV Forum Custom Search
Info on Adding Photos to a Post
RV Life Network FAQ
Mary F is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2006, 08:23 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 78 Scamp 13 ft
Posts: 118
Thank you to everyone! Hubby and I have been talking about "what vehicle next" anyway, since his little Saturn is at 280,000 miles and we may have to get something else soon.

He talked to our dealer, who is SO nice- he says we'd be better off getting a Saturn Vue than an L Series for the same money- same gas mileage! And the Vue will be perfect for the camper.

Goodie, Debra gets the Vue- hubby has to stick to the little bitty ones since HE drives far more than I do ! hahahaha
Deb in MN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 12:36 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 74 13 ft Boler and 79 17 ft Boler
Posts: 568
Personally I find my GMC 4.8L, 280 HP, V8, ext. cab , short box pickup under powered for my 17' Boler on flat land with any head wind.....it`ll not go into OD....It`s OK w/o OD but fuel goes thru much quicker, but haven`t gone far enough for a mileage check vs my 13' Boler.....With the 13' I can tow in OD almost all the time except climbing grades in the mountains.....I believe that the difference is the wind load on the frontal area of the two trailers......If I had a different gear ratio in the diff or a 5.3 L engine with about 10 more HP but with a lot more with torque, it would probably be OK but burn more fuel running empty........so there is a trade off.....Benny
Benny K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 10:56 AM   #12
Member
 
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 73
Benny k
Cruise control and OD are good for flat terrain, but use more gas in hilly areas. I do not use the cruise control in mountains or hilly areas.
bdiscount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 04:36 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 74 13 ft Boler and 79 17 ft Boler
Posts: 568
I`ve never noticed much difference....in the mountains, if approaching a long grade , I`ll run in 3 rd with the cruise off and accelerate to may be 70 mph then as the speed drops off I`ll let it drop slowly and not let it drop into 2 nd gear unless my speed is down somewhat ....towing the 13' I average about 21 MPG IMP or 16-17 US which may include mountains out West, which I think isn`t too bad......I can`t really compare the 13' to the 17' because I`ve never taken the 17' for a real long haul but I do notice more fuel consumption on 2 way runs in Manitoba of 200-300 miles ......A lot of people tow 16 or 17 foot trailers with less engine and less power and are very satisfied.....Benny
Benny K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 05:05 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 2002 17 ft Casita Spirit Deluxe
Posts: 106
Debra,
Our first vehicle for towing was a Ford Ranger 4.0 litre engine. It did quite well pulling our 17 ft Casita, but had limited storage capacity and ceratinly would not accomodate any more people comfortably than just two. Subsequently, we purchased a new Honda Odyssey in 2004 and have been very pleased. It carries all the cargo we need and more. It can serve nicely as a people carrier, and gas mileage is excellent. We get around 29 highway.

The Honda is rated at 3500 lbs, as has been stated and is probably the most versatile vehicle we have ever owned.

Just a testimony from two happy campers. Don
Donald Stahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 05:11 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 2002 17 ft Casita Spirit Deluxe
Posts: 106
I should qualify the mileage figure - that is not towing the trailer. While towing we get around 15 - 16 mpg. Curiously, the mileage figures towing with several different vehicles are pretty close to being the same. What you will appreciate is the better figure than what you would have from some humongous stick built rv. We once camped next to a huge bulgemobile with expanding sides for a 12 ft wide living room, asked the guy what he got for mpg highway. All he said was 'you don't want to know.' Don't think you will be reluctant to reveal yours ! Don
Donald Stahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 06:42 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
BOBSMITH's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2002 Casita Freedom Deluxe / 2007 Nissan Frontier King Cab
Posts: 733
We tow with a 1999 Nissan Frontier with a V6 4WD. We get about 18mpg when towing our Casita and the truck bed fully loaded, plus our 15 foot canoe.

We keep the cruise control about 60mph, sometimes creeping a little higher than that. We slow down on steep inclines going over the high mountains up into the NC/VA/TN/WV/GA high country.
BOBSMITH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 08:01 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Brian B-P's Avatar
 
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
Perhaps one factor to keep in mind is trailer width. The Boler 1700 that I have (like Benny's) is a wide-body: it's a foot wider than the typical narrow-body egg. The Scamp, Casita, and Escape 16' to 17' units are all narrow-bodies, while recent (1500-series, 2500-series) Bigfoot models of similar length are wide-bodies (even wider than the B1700). Apparently Burros come in both widths. Since air drag is very important at highway speeds, width (which determines frontal area) matters.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 07:06 AM   #18
Member
 
Trailer: 86 Burro 17 ft Widebody
Posts: 64
17' Burro wide body, 2400 pounds. 2004 F150 2WD super crew, 5.4L, 3.73:1 rear axle ratio. 13-16 MPG at 60 MPH. At 65-70MPH the mileage will drop to 11. I learned that the 3.73 gears really make a difference if using cruise control. This truck will just keep pulling in OD without downshifting. I look at the slight fuel penalty as cheap life insurance. It also reminds me to keep the speed down.
Rick
Attached Thumbnails
burro_1.jpg  
Rick F. D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 10:19 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 74 13 ft Boler and 79 17 ft Boler
Posts: 568
I`m guessing that if I had a 3.73 gear instead of my 3.42, I`d notice the difference....the next one would be a 4.10......problem then would be I`d have to feather the throttle more when taking off when empty,LOL......Oh...gross trailer weight for my truck is 6100 lbs. with a GCWR of 11,000 lbs. ....my truck is my primary transportation but if I decide to get a car and use my truck basically to tow only, then I may change the ratio......Benny
Benny K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2006, 10:07 AM   #20
Administrator
 
Mary F's Avatar
 
Trailer: Casita 1999 17 ft Liberty Deluxe
Posts: 10,948
Registry
Anybody have experience backing a 17 footer uphill on a gravel road?

Our 4.0L Ford Ranger manages our 17 ft. Casita just fine, except for when we get home and cannot back it up our gravel driveway.


Twice now, we've had to unhitch and connect it to the F-150 to get it parked... (The Ranger has tow package and limited slip differential, whatever that is. The F-150 has no package, similar horsepower, but bigger tires, better traction.)

__________________
Mary F Fiberglass Rules!
________________________________
FGRV Forum Custom Search
Info on Adding Photos to a Post
RV Life Network FAQ
Mary F is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bed size??? curtis c General Chat 1 03-04-2009 03:53 PM
Bed Size Legacy Posts Care and Feeding of Molded Fiberglass Trailers 30 01-18-2009 09:09 AM
Need some help, ball size & towing Arline Lovell Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 10 06-08-2008 02:59 PM
Bed Size Rob M General Chat 8 03-26-2008 03:23 PM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.