Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Gibbens
Now I ain't calling you a liar - I'm just saying I don't believe you.
I think you are going to spend quite a bit of that $10,000,000 cash money on things that will shorten your life quite considerably and so your promise to save one life may not be entirely true.....
|
You digress, the $100,000,000 was "worth it" while only addressing carbon monoxide warning devices. The life saved there would most likely have more peccadillos than I, which are not addressed by the spending.
As I stated earlier.... "Legal and available is just not enough?"
According to the extant logic, the money in each case was only to address the one issue and as long as I don't die from CO poisoning I will have fullfilled the premise.
Of course My point was only to show the facetiousness of the premise while avoiding the censure, which would have certainly been brought on by a better argument.
'nuff sed!