How suitable is an Element as a tow vehicle? - Page 2 - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×

Go Back   Fiberglass RV > Fiberglass RV Community Forums > General Chat
Click Here to Login
Register Registry FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-03-2006, 03:55 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
jack maloney's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1986 U-Haul CT13 ft
Posts: 494
Quote:
....does anyone know the factors that contibute to the rating? For example I can not find ANY tow rating for the subaru. Is the weight concern regarding the ability of the vehicle to get the load moving and keep it moving regardless of up or down hills, or is it a function of the ability of the unit to a safe stop, or is there something else that goes into the equation.
Tow ratings are determined by the vehicle manufacturer according to several criteria, including engine size, transmission, axle ratio, brakes, chassis, cooling systems and other special equipment.
jack maloney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 08:59 PM   #22
Moderator
 
Frederick L. Simson's Avatar
 
Trailer: Fiber Stream 1978 / Honda Odyssey LX 2003
Posts: 8,222
Registry
Send a message via AIM to Frederick L. Simson
Talking

Quote:
Tow ratings are determined by the vehicle manufacturer according to several criteria, including engine size, transmission, axle ratio, brakes, chassis, cooling systems and other special equipment.
I think I read somewhere, when I was researching tow vehicles, that each component of the car may have a different "Tow Rating." The manufacturer then uses the "weakest link" theory to set the vehicle's rating at the lowest rated component's rating...
__________________
Frederick - The Scaleman
Frederick L. Simson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 09:12 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Trailer: 2005 Tab
Posts: 17
I am glad to say that I have had the dealer actually weight the trailer and check the capability of my hitch and tongue.
It would appear that the trailer, with load of propane and battery and all other items being purchased will come to less than 1500#, and the hitch and tongue are rated class 2 so the remaining concern that I had was the need for a transmission cooler....and the local Honda dealer just kind of waived it off on the basis that if it hunts for the right gear pull in a lower gear....his comment was "it's a Honda....doesnt care if it revs at 5000rpm all day...it will only cost a little more gas"
He also said dont worry about a transmission cooler....in our winters at 30 below it could cause more problems than it helps with in the summer.

So at this point I will be meeting with the T@B dealer to talk about wiring for the Element tomorrow.

At this point I have the small inline 4 pin wiring harness that is connected in behind the passenger side rear inside quarter panel......that was a bugger to put in last year! So they are recommending new wiring as he put it "from the front back" for the trailer including a charge line.

So hopefully I will be set to go before the week is out! Then waiting months for acceotable weather for a trip!!!!

Thanks for the replies and great source of information to all of you.

Ken D
Ken D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 09:43 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Gina D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
Registry
Ken,

Go find another T@B dealer now. RUN away as far as you can. This guy is trying to bilk you, or at the very least, he is totally unknowledgable about your Element.

I question you Honda dealers wisdom too

I have the 4 wire set up on my E as well. I installed it myself, using aftermarket harness and with considerably less annoyance than Honda makes it out to be (Or half the guys on the Element club ) Took me less than an hour, and my passenger side panels stayed put.

If you are going with a TAB, you only need a charge line. Surge brakes.. no electric controller. No line needed. ONE run from your battery. Everything else is ALREADY THERE. They are trying to convince you of something you don't need. What would you possibly need to replace working lines for?

Mine is a 7 pin now. My installer for the brake controller and charge line simply tapped off my 4 for the standard lights (And left me the 4 pin plug in case I needed to tug a utility trailer etc) and ran the brake and charge line back from the front. 2 lines. Thats all. They all bundle neatly together nicely in a 7 pin socket welded to my hitch.

I am sure U Haul can do the same for you at very little cost, or you can even do it yourself if all you are running is the charge line. How hard can ONE line be?

I take it the T@B has a 6 pole connector? Adaptors and connectors are easy available at Wal Mart for a few dollars. (Under 15) If you installed your 4 pin, this will be a peice of cake compared to that.

Were you actually there and witnessed the weighing of your trailer yourself? What he said is contrary to everything commonly known of these T@Bs and very much lower than T@Bs own published specs, which, as mentioned, are usually on the LOW end.

Caveat Emptor on this one.

A tranny cooler is very cheap insurance. I paid 140 or so, installed, at U Hual. A new tranny is what? How many 1000s? Once it is in, there is nothing else to do. The E tranny is sealed.

It IS a Honda, and just my opinion, a very durable auto, but I certainly wouldn't rack it to 5k rpm for more than a second, much less all day.

I think there is a yahoo group for T@B owners.. do some searches and read what real owners have and how they are doing. My gut feeling is that they are much closer to reality than what this dealer is trying to tell you. Especially with his wiring recommendations.. something does not smell right here.

Oh wait, my dog is on the couch with me...
Gina D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 09:47 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Patrick M.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 Casita Liberty Deluxe 17 ft / Honda Odyssey
Posts: 705
Ken, good luck with that tab!

I think the 4-wire connector you already have can be used in conjunction with a battery charge line from the front, and a brake controller (if needed) from the front. No need to completely rewire. Adapters are available to covert it to the round plug needed by most trailers.

Honda does not require a trans cooler for the Element and 1,500#. Doesn't even offer one. But a lot of people believe they are must have items. I'm still on the fence on the need and haven't installed. Gina being smart had UHaul install one for about $100 as I recall.

My water temp gauge (transmission fluid is cooled in the bottom of the radiator) has only moved up slightly three times when towing - when it was 115F and traveling at 30mph!

Patrick

Oops, just read Gina's reply and do agree on her opinion on the Honda dealer, as I thought his statements were idiotic, and yeah the Tab dealer sounds like he's trying to generate more income. And yeah, I'm not a big fan of the Tab either having looked at one carefully. Much more restrictive than a 13' fiberglass, but to each his own.
Patrick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 10:17 PM   #26
Junior Member
 
Trailer: 2005 Tab
Posts: 17
Gina The reason I am going to the dealer is to talk with his installer in person. He said the installer felt it might be simpler to run new lines.....my immediate reaction was "why I have a proper set there now that can be re-routed!" The other thing I want him to tell me is how he would run a charge line. Do you simply fuse your charge line or use a breaker?

Another point I found out was that the T@B I am looking at is last years model, fibreglass and with 15inch wheels rather than the 16s they put on the new ones. As far as weighing, he took them to a local scale where the staff of the scale sign off on the weight....I am gonna be looking at that too!

Anyway the deal is that last years model means a fairly significant price drop and they include a tent room addition that doubles the usable sheltered space when set up camping...so I will proceed with caution rather than run away!! But thanks for your concern

Ken D.
Ken D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 10:27 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Chester Taje's Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 4,897
I have very little faith in what dealers tell me.I looked at a T@B and the dealer told me my little car could pull it.

I told him in words that I can't use here what I thought of him.

Here is a advertisment of my car.
http://www.toyota.com/matrix/
__________________
Retired Underground Coal Miner.
Served in Canadian Army (1PPCLI)
Chester Taje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 10:32 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Gina D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
Registry
Ken,

There is a simple inline fuse on my line. I don't recall the value. It is inline right after the terminal and easily accessed from the engine compartment. The line then drops down and is tied off on various beams and chassis junk, and brought to the proper pin on the 7 pin socket. Cable wrap is used, even for the single line.

My tap from my 4 wire is also simple. The plug is cut off about 10 inches back, right under the hitch where everything is easily accessible, 4 wires are tapped in and then the plug end and tail are also tied in (solder, crimps AND heat shrink) The 4 wires run in wrap over to the socket, also tied to the hitch.

Everything can be accessed out in the open, nothing needs to "Come Out".

I have no problem with taps and crimps if they are done properly. They will last for years, and frankly, it's easier to fix a failed crimp (If needed) and less expensive than running all new lines.

You can also buy a 4 to 6 adaptor. Check it out. Most of the adaptors can be opened and lines added. You could do the same with your charge line.

I ran with a 4 to 7 adaptor for a couple years!
Gina D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 10:36 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Donna D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 1988 16 ft Scamp Deluxe
Posts: 25,710
Quote:
I have very little faith in what dealers tell me.I looked at a T@B and the dealer told me my little car could pull it.

I told him in words that I can't use here what I thought of him.
He may have been absolutely correct Ches...you probably could have pulled it out of the parking lot, but how about uphill or STOPPING. Yeow!!
__________________
Donna D.
Ten Forward - 2014 Escape 5.0 TA
Double Yolk - 1988 16' Scamp Deluxe
Donna D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 10:41 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Gina D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
Registry
Come to think of it Ken, you would not even need to go that far. You could wire in the charge line and remove the 4 wire plug, and hardwire it all at the 6 pin if you don't think you'll have a need for a 4.

I wanted to keep mine, thats why it's done that way.

.
Gina D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 10:41 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Chester Taje's Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 4,897
I find it hard to beleive my car has a tow rating of 1500#s.On some of the hills around here I have to gear right down
__________________
Retired Underground Coal Miner.
Served in Canadian Army (1PPCLI)
Chester Taje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 11:20 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
jack maloney's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1986 U-Haul CT13 ft
Posts: 494
I believe what we have here is a consumer decision already made, looking for confirmation rather than advice, and determined to go forward despite the manufacturer's own specifications. If that is the case, there's not much more to be said, except to wish Ken D. good luck and happiness with his T@B.
jack maloney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 07:49 PM   #33
Junior Member
 
Trailer: 2005 Tab
Posts: 17
Again thanks for the concern Gina. The dealer put his "wiring guy" into my element and he quickly said..."only need a charge line from the battery and we can take the rest from the wiring that is in place!

So now, since I have had so many people refer to a new 13ft scamp.....who can tell me what they cost (please specify cdn or us dollars) I still like the T@B and think their shape would help in the gas milage question....but the deal is not yet sealed.

Ken D.
Ken D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 07:54 PM   #34
Junior Member
 
Trailer: 2005 Tab
Posts: 17
Quote:
Honda does not require a trans cooler for the Element and 1,500#. Doesn't even offer one. But a lot of people believe they are must have items. I'm still on the fence on the need and haven't installed. Gina being smart had UHaul install one for about $100 as I recall.
I appreciated your reply Patrick......real world numbers are usefull!! My comment about the transmission coolers were made due to the fact that 6 months of each year the temeratures in my part of the world are bleow freezing. I was led to believe that in those conditions without the trailer attached the tranny cooler could actually be detrimental to the Element!

Ken D
Ken D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 08:00 PM   #35
Junior Member
 
Trailer: 2005 Tab
Posts: 17
Quote:
I believe what we have here is a consumer decision already made, looking for confirmation rather than advice, and determined to go forward despite the manufacturer's own specifications. If that is the case, there's not much more to be said, except to wish Ken D. good luck and happiness with his T@B.
What can I say Jack?

I came here looking to hear the pro's and the cons of what I was looking at....In that way I have heard much of both sides of the topic. (although the negative always was made assuming the current 2006 specs for T@B weight from their web site. And as I have pointed out I am looking at a 2005 model which has now weighed in at 1400#)
Having seen far more information and opinion to support that this combination will perform well than reasons to run away, I am now at the point of determining a final price that will be asked of the T@B. At this point I am hopefull that a deal will be made!
Thanks for your opinions, I was looking for genuine opinions from people with towing experience, and I think that is what I got.

Ken D.
Ken D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 08:42 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
Patrick M.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 Casita Liberty Deluxe 17 ft / Honda Odyssey
Posts: 705
Ken, good to hear the dealer didn't want to rewire!

I think all of us here in the Fiberglass forum would hope you would take the time to check out a 13' fiberglass as we feel they have some advantages over the T@B. I sure the folks over in the T@B forum feel the opposite. So take such comments with due consideration to the source.

The most important point, and one we can all agree on, is the joy of truckin on down the road with a small, light trailer in tow, ready for adventures each day.

Good luck!

Patrick
Patrick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 10:16 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 74 13 ft Boler and 79 17 ft Boler
Posts: 568
Quote:
I appreciated your reply Patrick......real world numbers are usefull!! My comment about the transmission coolers were made due to the fact that 6 months of each year the temeratures in my part of the world are bleow freezing. I was led to believe that in those conditions without the trailer attached the tranny cooler could actually be detrimental to the Element!
Ken D
Hi Ken, believe that all Hayden tranny coolers use small and large passages so that if the tranny oil is too stiff, as in a Saskatchewan winter, , that it bypasses most of the cooler thru the larger passages until the oil is warm and the viscosity thin enough to go thru the smaller passages.....this way you always get oil thru the cooler and you can leave the cooler on all year....Benny
Benny K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 10:48 PM   #38
Senior Member
 
Gina D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
Registry
I have no intention of demeaning the T@B. It looks to be well made and is a nice modern slick looking rig, but I think you should call Scamp or Casita and compare thier 13s. They are the only ones that can quote you an accurate price based on the options you chose.

All the technicalities (Weight, Avg. price etc) are neck and neck if buying new. BUT, the advantages you will see with an Egg, in my opinion, make it a better bang for the buck.

Most notably is floor space. I have a reasonably large open center floor. Enough to sit down and wrestle with two dogs and toss toys, etc.. set up a shower, and NOT bump into anything or anyone doing so.

I can sleep 3, 2 in one bed, and 1 on the sofa. Most 13s have a bunk option over the front sofa, so you could even sleep 2 kids and 2 adults. I sometimes sleep on the sofa if I am not toting K9s. It is pleasant to sit and stretch out on the sofa and read, nap or watch TV without the confinement of the dinette. You can make your dinnette a permanent bed and still have awake time sitting space. Lot's, if not most folks here do just that. A TV tray or folding table make a suitable eating station without disturbing the bed.

I have already mentioned the advantages of electric brakes over surge brakes.

I can stand up in the entire length of the trailer, not just in the front.

You can also have more people in the trailer at one time, and even if it is only two folks, you are not forced to be in close proximity. One of you can be on the sofa on the other at the table or in bed and relaxing independantly.

The only real advantage to the T@B I can see is instant gratification. If you have to have it NOW, A Scamp or Casita will not do as they are by order only. And you have to pay shipping or travel to get it youself.

The Eggs have a proven longevity with little repair. That is easy to see from reading this board. Some are close to 30 years old and still going strong. That is directly related to the molded construction. T@Bs are small stickies with a unique shape. They are too new to tell if they will develope stickie like issues, but I bet some will show up within a few years.
Gina D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 06:28 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
Roger H's Avatar
 
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
There are, in my humble view, several advantages of the molded trailers vs. stick builts like the T@b, and several more over the teardrop design. Science figured out eons ago that the teardrop shape is the most efficient at cutting through the air; however, presuming that gas mileage of the combination tow rig will be lower with a teardrop-shaped trailer won't be accurate. Your fuel economy depends on the aerodynamics of the entire moving mass and each combination is significantly different. My Scamp 16' has very little effect on gas mileage behind my Tundra. My Burro caused a 5mpg drop behind my '94 Toyota compact truck, and I suspect that was mostly aerodynamics. My mileage improved by a mpg when I put the new axle under the Burro... apparently the slipstream under the truck/trailer combination was causing drag... the only real way to know what real-world results you're going to have will be to try it out. It's interesting to compare your results with others towing similar and then different trailers with similar tow vehicles. I get 17 mpg towing my Scamp 16' custom Deluxe with the Tundra, and I only got about 19 mpg yesterday on a 600 mile round trip without the trailer.

The advantages of molded trailers vs. stickies come in a variety of flavors; the first being longevity. As a result of not having skin fastened to a frame, there are no fasteners to work lose. Leaks don't cause the body frame to rot (cause there IS no frame... the molded fiberglass is self-supporting), and leaks that DO develop are primarily from anticipated places (through-hull openings). With regular attention to the sealants used in those locations (like every 10-15 years or so) a fiberglass trailer won't develop leaks. Stickies have a design life of about 10 years, and it's rare to see ones older than 10 years that are still useable. The earliest molded fiberglass trailers we've seen have been from the mid-60's and they're still going strong. Last is the resale value. Some of the early Scamps and Bolers are still selling for close to their original sales price, and newer molded trailers tend not to depreciate at nearly the same rate as stickies (the T@b included). I'm not wealthy, but wealth preservation is important to me. I don't want to lose more money to depreciation than I have to when I buy stuff.

The last thing that the FGRVs offer over the T@b is room. I've investigated T@b quite thoroughly as well as they are, frankly, cute! The design itself, however, is limiting. You lose a third of your total interior volume to the swept rear and rounded front. As I said earlier, the design is presumed to be a gas-saver, but I don't think room for mileage is a good trade-off, and the mileage claim may be spurious anyway. Further, Gina just reported 20mpg pulling her Burro in some super-adverse condtions and I doubt that you'll better that significantly pulling the T@b with an Element under ideal conditions.

Good luck with your decision!

Roger
Roger H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 04:23 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 2005 13 ft Scamp / 2004 Honda Odyssey
Posts: 1,079
When we bought our new scamp last April we paid around $8,000 US to have it made the way we want. Since we wanted to keep the weight down we did not get the refrigerator, air conditioning or awning. We did get the front and rear cabinets (wouldn't want to be without them), extra outlet, fantastic fan, 27 battery (weighs a bit more and we really don't need it), and vinyl instead of carpet. We also did not get the ice box or the water tank in the back as we only carry one or two gallons of water. I prefer the large door where the ice box would be with the additional shelves we put in I have lots of storage. Where the water tank would be is also lots of extra storage.

A useless option for us was the city water hookup. We will probably never, ever use that. After pull 12,500 miles since April we have never been hooked up to electricity much less water!

I took a year to decide what we wanted. Attended a T@B rally and then a Scamp Camp. I still like the T@B, but we are very happy we got the Scamp for many of the reasons Roger mentioned.

We met up with T@B friends on the road and in a parking lot in the rain the four of us got in the Scamp to visit for a few minutes. They keep their bed down all the time so not even two people can stand and move at the same time. Fred and I have room in our little 13.

We are short. I can see where a tall person would like the original T@B floor plan so they can sleep with their feet hanging out. We removed the front top bunk and I sleep on the bottom front bunk. Fred sleeps in the rear.

Hope this helps you. Leon Peiffer on the T@B thread can also tell you how he feels about the two units. He would probably like to private mail you with his ideas. It is after all a T@B web site.

Nancy in MN
Nancy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda Element Richard Jackson Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 3 03-29-2009 09:27 AM
Trailers Suitable for AC Steve R General Chat 13 07-28-2008 12:32 PM
Element Owners Pete Dumbleton General Chat 6 02-26-2008 05:26 PM
Mod to an Element not a camper Paula Bindrich General Chat 10 02-15-2008 07:25 PM
Honda Element (again) DonInChatt General Chat 12 09-12-2006 10:00 PM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.