|
08-30-2007, 10:50 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 1972 Compact Jr
Posts: 229
|
Many have noted the observation of similarities between Hunter, Compacts, Havasu. Some bear the tags of Hunter industrusties of Chatsworth, CA., another on E-bay, being sold by a member of this formum clearly has a tag, Family Wagon, Compact Equipment Company of Irwindale, California. Doing a search for Family Wagon and Compact Equipment Company I came across this site which gave the background for a tax conflict/judgement. Seems there was a company Trafco that made recreational vehicles , and while having difficulties sold off some subsiduaries. The Compact Equipment Company changed hands and and was produce under the label Family wagon. I wonder if Trafco as parent company provided the basis for Hunter, Havasu , Compact or whether the distinctions came after Trafco sold off.It looks like Family Wagon came into being about 1975.
Another one else want to add to the story.
http://law.onecle.com/tax/1999/compact.tcm.wpd03.html
|
|
|
08-30-2007, 11:39 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Trailer: Fiber Stream 1978 / Honda Odyssey LX 2003
Posts: 8,222
|
I remember "Family Wagon" as being a Dealer option Van Conversion back in the mid '70s. You could get a Dodge Van, and have a Plush interior with a seat that folded into a double bed, and a sink and Ice-box, and a stereo system with lots of speakers, and a raised fiberglass roof.
I think a lot of Families were started in those vans...
__________________
Frederick - The Scaleman
|
|
|
08-31-2007, 08:50 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
|
My Dad never let me go out with any guy that had a van.
I am sure we have a lot of molds that have tripped from one company to the other and just got modifications and face lifts. I also wish I know more about patent laws (Did I just say that? ) to figure out how so many of these appear to be identical in every way except for a skulpty bit here, or a light there... and manufacturers get away with it.
I guess there isn't a lot you can do to make them different.. kinda like cars. The ones that are REALLY different command a much higher $$$$.
|
|
|
08-31-2007, 09:02 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 7,056
|
Quote:
My Dad never let me go out with any guy that had a van.
I am sure we have a lot of molds that have tripped from one company to the other and just got modifications and face lifts. I also wish I know more about patent laws (Did I just say that? ) to figure out how so many of these appear to be identical in every way except for a skulpty bit here, or a light there... and manufacturers get away with it.
I guess there isn't a lot you can do to make them different.. kinda like cars. The ones that are REALLY different command a much higher $$$$.
|
Patents are an interesting thing. There's several possible reasons why the identical appearance. If the original inverter never got a patent, then nobody else can. It's called prior art.
Another, you think you've got it nailed. You've sent a lot of money on patent lawyers and patent fees, etc. Now you're got your patent. Along comes somebody that does just a bit more and better digging than your lawyer and finds in another country an bit of paper describing what you've just got a patent for. You guess it, prior art. Your is not supportable.
You'd be amazed at how much and often this happens.
A patent is full disclosure. Your invention is now public knowledge. Somebody comes along and makes an improvement on your invention, and patents the improvement. All sorts of things happen here.
Many companies don't bother, but rather rely on their position in the market place to sell a product that doesn't have a patent, but does have some trade secrets. Coke-A-Cola is probably the best know for this.
OOPS, Don't intend to hi-jack this thread.
Back OT. Kent very interesting. It seems that many of these little trailers history is lost in the misty fog of time.
__________________
Byron & Anne enjoying the everyday Saturday thing.
|
|
|
08-31-2007, 02:12 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
|
While I agree that what Bryon has said is true, I also think that it does not apply to trailer shapes, because they are not patentable in the first place.
You might get a registered industrial design, but there is nothing functionally unique about the shape, so any no patent should ever be issued for them. The patent world is far from perfect, and many unworthy patents have been issued, but the shape of a trailer would be a pretty extreme case.
Think of it like copyrights: a composer copyrights a song, but cannot patent it; a trailer manufacturer could register the shape of their bodyshell, but if they don't, anyone can copy it.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
|
|
|
08-31-2007, 09:44 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 84 Burro 13 ft
Posts: 134
|
In order to patent an invention, uniqueness is required. As Brian B-P has mentioned more than once, appliances, lights, hitches, and many other various components are easily available and interchangeable. FG is used in many applications so is not unique either. Even the design may not qualify as unique as most configurations have been used in other tt's..
Many of the companies that manufactured FG trailers are/were small marginal companies and if they in fact had a patent, they would be hard pressed to fight to protect it.
Trade names and Trade marks are generally registered by state, by country, or internationally. A name such as "family wagon" may not be registerable if found to be in the general domain as a commonly used combination of words. As such, anyone can use the combination.
China is now manufacturing a "Mercedes". It is a direct copy of the Mercedes with a Chinese name of course. It will be interesting to see what if anything, Mercedes will do.
|
|
|
11-28-2010, 06:47 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina D.
My Dad never let me go out with any guy that had a van.
|
My mother would have approved. She bought a new car and as my sister and I were about to start driving, she managed to get a special-order MG built with a reclining seat on the driver's side (for her back problems) but with a non-reclining seat on the passenger side (to avoid other 'problems').
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Upcoming Events |
No events scheduled in the next 465 days.
|
|