Subaru's towing specifications make absolutely no sense!! - Page 2 - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×

Go Back   Fiberglass RV > Fiberglass RV Community Forums > General Chat
Click Here to Login
Register Registry FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-22-2016, 06:39 AM   #21
Member
 
Name: Anthony
Trailer: Scamp 13
Vermont
Posts: 31
What about a weight distribution hitch?

I was reading about weight distribution hitches. Would using one of these be beneficial, towing a 13 footer with a 4 cylinder Forester, standard transmission, 175 lb. tongue weight, or is it unnecessary for my application? Also, in watching a video on this product it was stated that in some applications the battery and gas tank(s) may need to be relocated in order to hook up the bars. Does anyone have experience with weight distribution hitches? Tony
Tony M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 07:45 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
honda03842's Avatar
 
Name: Norm and Ginny
Trailer: Scamp 16
Florida
Posts: 7,517
You shouldn't need WD with a Scamp 13. Our son tows his with a 4 cylinder Accord. He has dual batteries on the hitch.

We tow a Scamp 16 without WD.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Fiberglass RV mobile app
__________________
Norm and Ginny

2014 Honda Odyssey
1991 Scamp 16
honda03842 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 09:57 AM   #23
Member
 
Name: Anthony
Trailer: Scamp 13
Vermont
Posts: 31
Thanks for the information Norm! Although I do pull a trailer with a motorcycle on it, that weight is only about 1,000 lbs. and well within my vehicles tow capacity so I've never given it a second thought. Pulling a heavier camper will be a new experience for us, so it is good to know of your experience towing with a 4 cylinder vehicle. Tony
Tony M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 10:14 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Carl V's Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony M View Post
Would using one of these be beneficial, towing a 13 footer with a 4 cylinder Forester, standard transmission, 175 lb. tongue weight, or is it unnecessary for my application?
Most WD hitches require a Class III hitch, which your Forester probably doesn't have.
I don't know about your trailer, but some trailer manufacturers prohibit the use of WD hitches (frame not sturdy enough).
And the smallest WD hitches on the market right now have a 400lb tongue weight capacity, probably be way too stiff for your application.

This being said, your rig and many other would probably benefit from a very small WD kit if there was some available on the market here.
For exemple, Hayman-Reese (Reese's Australian division) markets very lightweight WD hitches with 80 or 135 kg tongue weight capacity, that would be just perfect for small FG trailer rigs. Too bad we don't get these over here.
Mini - Mini - hayman reese

Reese USA used to sell a similar 220lbs-rated light duty WD hitch that would have been great, but it has been discontinued for about 10 years now. It was compatible with Class II hitches. They don't even make their 350-lbs rated 350Mini anymore, very popular with the popup trailer crowd (I own one). Even this one would be too stiff for a 13' FG egg I thing.
Carl V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 10:30 AM   #25
Junior Member
 
Name: John
Trailer: Still shopping...
Kentucky
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLF View Post
Would you share with me the year of your 4Runner? I own a 2000 and have only a 5000lb tow rating and don't know of any higher rating for any 4Runner built after that.
We have an '04 V8.
7,000 lb AWD 7,300 RWD
I believe they stopped putting V8's in 4Runners in '05.
__________________
'16 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited
'04 Toyota 4Runner V8 AWD
'03 Honda Gold Wing
KYBubblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 10:52 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
The Minimalist's Avatar
 
Name: Clif
Trailer: 08 Weiscraft Little Joe 14 Subaru Outback 2.5i CVT
Louisiana
Posts: 754
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony M View Post
I was reading about weight distribution hitches. Would using one of these be beneficial, towing a 13 footer with a 4 cylinder Forester, standard transmission, 175 lb. tongue weight, or is it unnecessary for my application? Also, in watching a video on this product it was stated that in some applications the battery and gas tank(s) may need to be relocated in order to hook up the bars. Does anyone have experience with weight distribution hitches? Tony
If you look in the towing section of your owners manual, you will find that it recommends against WDH.

Regards.
__________________
Clif
The Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 11:54 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Name: Steve
Trailer: 2018, 21ft escape— 2019 Ram 1500 Laramie
NW Wisconsin
Posts: 4,500
We tow our 17 ft Casita with a 1/2 ton fullsize truck and a WDH.
Our vehicle according to the owner's manual does not require a WDH for towing our trailer but for us it tows better with a WDH.
IMHO ,a WDH is not the solution for towing with an insufficient tow vehicle. All a WDH does is shift the weight from the vehicles rear axle to the vehicles front axle and the trailer axle. The weight does not just magically disappear. If your vehicle is rated to tow 2000 lbs
with 200 lbs of tongue weight then using a WDH does not allow you to tow 2500 lbs safely.
steve dunham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 12:27 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Glenn Baglo's Avatar
 
Trailer: Escape 17 ft
Posts: 8,317
My WDH weighs 68 lbs. all by itself.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
Glenn Baglo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 05:24 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
sokhapkin's Avatar
 
Name: Sergey
Trailer: 2014 Scamp 16 layout 4, 2018 Winnebago Revel 4x4
SW Florida
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelypip View Post
Pickup trucks and sport utes are much more profitable than sedans and wagons for manufacturers that make both...you figure it out.
The more I'm thinking about this, the more this seems to me as a myth. Cars are more profitable to a manufacturer.
__________________
Sergey
sokhapkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 05:38 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Name: Tom
Trailer: Outfitter truck campper
Colorado
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by sokhapkin View Post
The more I'm thinking about this, the more this seems to me as a myth. Cars are more profitable to a manufacturer.

Nope, Steely is correct. Trucks and SUVs' are much more profitable.
TomandCallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 06:00 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Byron Kinnaman's Avatar
 
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 7,056
Registry
I see a lot of people think they can compare European of the same model with American cars. I've said this before THEY ARE NOT THE SAME VEHICLE. For one just try and find a place to buy gasoline, it's difficult. They're all diesel, even the Austin Martin I looked at was diesel. So would imagine there's many more differences. So if you wish to compare apples and oranges OK, but they don't compare very well.
__________________
Byron & Anne enjoying the everyday Saturday thing.
Byron Kinnaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 06:50 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron Kinnaman View Post
I see a lot of people think they can compare European of the same model with American cars. I've said this before THEY ARE NOT THE SAME VEHICLE. For one just try and find a place to buy gasoline, it's difficult. They're all diesel, even the Austin Martin I looked at was diesel. So would imagine there's many more differences. So if you wish to compare apples and oranges OK, but they don't compare very well.
Even comparing apples to apples can be very subjective and depends on how you plan to consume them.
Let's face it... the least palatable apple ever grown is called "DELICIOUS!" (its like applesauce in a leather skin!)
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 11:20 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Name: Ginny
Trailer: '09 Scamp 13' w/ Bath
Oklahoma
Posts: 137
A little late to the discussion, but I thought I would contribute this article. I thought it explained the difference between UK and US tow ratings really well.

Tow me down!
fieldphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 11:40 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Bobbie Mayer's Avatar
 
Trailer: Trails West Campster 1970
Posts: 3,366
Registry
I read that article. But out here- in the west- towing speeds are almost always 10 mph lower than max freeway speeds. On a recent trip the fastest speed while towing I saw posted was 60 mph. I stick to the posted towing speed limits because I've never felt it was safe to go faster. I know not everyone does (I got passed by plenty of huge rigs going max freeway speed in Oregon the other day) but unless tow limits are set so that you can ignore speed limits I don't think the article really explains the difference. Yes, it is safer to tow more at slower speeds. But we already knew that.

Towing at the posted speed limit with my 2012 Forester 5-speed, probably about 2000 lbs with a 200 lb tongue weight, I got 19-20 mpg and the rig was very stable. No sway even when passed by big tractor trailers. I took turns at posted speeds (yellow "warning" speeds) and was fine. The main thing I didn't like was when the roads were rougher as I got more bounce than I like- not sure why that was. (Happens with the Campster, too- especially through sections of 5 in Seattle/Fed Way area.) I don't think I'd go much over that weight, though- for one, unless I went over the tongue weight, I'd be getting a lower % (Subaru says 8-12% but I prefer at least 10%) and because even with manual transmission it would be harder to get a heavier trailer up steep hills. I see "even with manual" because I've driven both and the automatic (similar year) is much less peppy on hills.
Bobbie Mayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 01:54 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Jon in AZ's Avatar
 
Name: Jon
Trailer: 2008 Scamp 13 S1
Arizona
Posts: 11,963
Registry
Subaru's towing specifications make absolutely no sense!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbie Mayer View Post
...But out here- in the west- towing speeds are almost always 10 mph lower than max freeway speeds...
Depends on whether you mean legal towing speeds, or actual towing speeds. In my corner of the West- Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah- legal towing speeds are the same as passenger vehicles, which is up to 75mph in Arizona.

However, in practice I have observed the vast majority of drivers pulling trailers have more sense than that, and 65mph is far more typical. Semis usually go somewhere between 65-70mph, even when the legal limit is higher. There are always a few in a big hurry, but they are the exception, not the rule.

Ironically, in California, where legal towing speeds are limited to 55mph, semis and RVs are going around 65mph (apparently with complete impunity). In other words, the strict towing law makes little perceptible difference in actual practice!
Jon in AZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 02:01 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 2002 19 ft Scamp 19 ft 5th Wheel
Posts: 3,640
Send a message via Yahoo to Darwin Maring
Towing specifications are there to do two things, 1 comply with government specifications and 2 To protect the company from law suites.
Darwin Maring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 02:57 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
Bobbie Mayer's Avatar
 
Trailer: Trails West Campster 1970
Posts: 3,366
Registry
I mean legal towing speeds, which I have always assumed are there for a reason!
Bobbie Mayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Absolutely no way to treat a customer! Tony Rubi General Chat 37 08-18-2014 03:44 AM
13 foot actual / real weight specifications Denis Ferkany Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 19 08-11-2012 05:52 PM
Confused about Scamp 13 interior height specifications VinceB Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 1 02-07-2009 04:02 PM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.