What Design Improvements Are Needed? - Page 2 - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×

Go Back   Fiberglass RV > Fiberglass RV Community Forums > General Chat
Click Here to Login
Register Registry FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-01-2017, 06:45 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
David B.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet (want 13 ft fiber glass
Posts: 2,316
Registry
[QUOTE=Tom 72;674451]I won't tease you. It is innovative and includes twice the fiberglass and half the resin. They vacuum infuse the resin.

I believe that is the way our Lil Snoozy is formed also. Very strong, not requiring any interior furniture for support. The Lil Hauley is a cargo trailer they make that is just a Lil Snoozy shell.
Dave & Paula
David B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 02:09 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Name: CalCop
Trailer: Casita
California
Posts: 221
Steve, Maybe you should design and build your own trailer. That way it would meet your standards perfectly
CalCop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 06:22 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Name: bob
Trailer: Was A-Liner now 13f Scamp
Missouri
Posts: 3,209
Robert your thoughts match mine one time we were cooking on a coleman gas stove guy pulls up in a 500k rig. Right away he asks what we were doing we told him at the time we had a 40f redone bus and we didn't like cooking smells in our rig.


he couldn't believe this and immediately went off to walmarts to get one. next thing I knew he was cooking outside having a ball. and yes lots of people bring their whole house with them they pull up spend an hour hooking all the junk up and you never see them until they depart.


to me this is camping and I bought a 13f scamper for these very reasons I want to be forced outside to enjoy life and meet people hard to do this setting in a lazyboy watching tv!!


good luck


bob
k0wtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 06:25 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Name: bob
Trailer: Was A-Liner now 13f Scamp
Missouri
Posts: 3,209
tom 72 I like the trailer I wonder what the start-up costs would be for this?


bob
k0wtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 01:02 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Civilguy's Avatar
 
Name: Mike
Trailer: Escape 21 & Jeep GC 5.7 (Previous 2012 Casita FD17 & 2010 Audi Q5)
Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 1,775
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by k0wtz View Post
I want to be forced outside to enjoy life and meet people


Bob,

The funny thing is that this was not what I wanted when we started trailering as I am not very outgoing. However, it has turned out to be one of the best parts for me.

Especially the kids; I start chuckling just thinking about some of the kids that we've met and seen at campgrounds over the past couple of years. Some people don't like having kids run around their space. I find I really enjoy it as it puts me in touch with a person I used to be long ago.

For kids, there is still a little magic in the world. That's a precious commodity which can be sorely lacking as we grow older. I would never want to deny them their chance to enjoy it while they can for they too will find themselves old all too soon.
__________________
~ “It’s absurd to divide people into good and bad. People are either charming or tedious.” Oscar Wilde ~
~ “What the human being is best at doing is interpreting all new information so that their prior conclusions remain intact.” Warren Buffett ~

Civilguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 01:57 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom 72 View Post
Airstream's Nest project is a good start. So is Basecamp. It shows they have noticed this segment.
Be careful what you wish for. If Airstream leads and others follow, your resale values could suffer. This pic doesn't show it but the back door is nice. Happier Campers have a full width back door.
I've owned several rear door trailers and I consider it to be a nonstarter.
As you point out it may work good for a cargo trailer.
With the prices on the Nest or the Happier Camper being what they are, they pose no threat to the resale on existing fiberglass trailers.
I have what I want, so resale will only be an issue for my estate.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 02:18 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Civilguy's Avatar
 
Name: Mike
Trailer: Escape 21 & Jeep GC 5.7 (Previous 2012 Casita FD17 & 2010 Audi Q5)
Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 1,775
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by floyd View Post
I've owned several rear door trailers and I consider it to be a nonstarter. <snip>
Floyd,

Why do you say that? We were attracted to the little Snoozy and were actually going to buy a Compact (jr?), but then "Casita happened", so I've never actually lived with a rear-door travel trailer.

If you would care to tell more about that I'd be interested to hear it.
__________________
~ “It’s absurd to divide people into good and bad. People are either charming or tedious.” Oscar Wilde ~
~ “What the human being is best at doing is interpreting all new information so that their prior conclusions remain intact.” Warren Buffett ~

Civilguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 03:29 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Civilguy View Post
Floyd,

Why do you say that? We were attracted to the little Snoozy and were actually going to buy a Compact (jr?), but then "Casita happened", so I've never actually lived with a rear-door travel trailer.

If you would care to tell more about that I'd be interested to hear it.
A more conventional trailer with a side entry allows for a more comfortable and usable layout, especially if you want a bathroom/shower.

I had a Compact Jr. to which I had added stab jacks to the rear bumper. One day I parked it in my shop to do some finish work on it.
It was parked sitting on the tongue jack, but without the stab jacks deployed.
I went to enter the trailer and when I stepped up on it, the trailer came out from under me like I had stepped on the back edge of a child's skate board. I fell back and the trailer landed back on the tongue jack about 4-5 feet forward of its starting position.
I like curbside entry when stopped while in transit as well.
The design tends to be rear heavy and less stable when well equipped.
Most of these things are subjective or can be compensated for.
These trailers are pretty cool in some ways and some people like them, just not my cup of tea.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 03:39 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Civilguy's Avatar
 
Name: Mike
Trailer: Escape 21 & Jeep GC 5.7 (Previous 2012 Casita FD17 & 2010 Audi Q5)
Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 1,775
Registry
Ah, yes, I can see the issue there Floyd.

I was sometimes negligent about deploying the stabilizers in the Casita when it was parked at home, but was fortunate I never overcame the balance when I crawled onto the bed to do some task.

However, you said a rear entry design trailer would be a "nonstarter" for you; it sounds to me like that Compact was almost more of a "self-starter"!
__________________
~ “It’s absurd to divide people into good and bad. People are either charming or tedious.” Oscar Wilde ~
~ “What the human being is best at doing is interpreting all new information so that their prior conclusions remain intact.” Warren Buffett ~

Civilguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2017, 08:45 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
David B.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet (want 13 ft fiber glass
Posts: 2,316
Registry
I have had the tongue come off the ground with our 13’ Standard Scamp when I failed to deploy the stab jacks, and the wife joined me at the table. I have never had that problem with the Lil Snoozy as the axle sits farther toward the rear of the trailer. Personally I prefer the rear entry layout over any other curently made FGRV on the market in a 17’ range, as it just feels so much larger.
Dave & Paula
David B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 12:24 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Borrego Dave's Avatar
 
Name: Dave
Trailer: Casita SD17 2006 "Missing Link"
California
Posts: 3,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B. View Post
Personally I prefer the rear entry layout over any other curently made FGRV on the market in a 17’ range, as it just feels so much larger.
Dave & Paula
I have to agree with you Dave after the "tour" of yours a couple times. Came close to buying one last year too.
Borrego Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 06:39 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
C&G in FL's Avatar
 
Name: Carl
Trailer: 2015 Escape 5.0TA
Florida
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B. View Post
Personally I prefer the rear entry layout over any other curently made FGRV on the market in a 17’ range, as it just feels so much larger.
This truly shows how we all view things differently. I strongly agree with Floyd on this issue in that I see a side entry as being more conducive to a useful layout. I have been inside at least three Lil Snoozies, and every one of them has seemed cramped to me, perhaps even claustrophobic. The only things I like about the Snoozy are its aerodynamic shape and its full sized bed, although one person has to crawl over the other to get out of bed. I wouldn’t own any trailer with a cassette trailer, and I find a room A/C poking out of the wall to be (as Donna D would put it) fugly. But obviously, some people have other opinions; I would have never had the opportunity to be inside a Lil Snoozy otherwise. Then again, I find Casitas somewhat confining, but I attribute that perception to the fact that the top of my head essentially brushes the ceiling when I walk around inside one. I personally find the interior of an Oliver roomy but uninviting due to sterile, “like a hospital operating room” look. But isn’t that part of the reason that this forum exists......so that we (and we are all different individuals) can share our differing opinions and experiences while relishing our shared preference for molded FG trailers?
C&G in FL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 07:43 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Name: Lisa
Trailer: 1992 Scamp 13'
California
Posts: 781
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon in AZ View Post
I wish Scamp would re-do the front bench mold to include a notch around the footwell with a ledge for a table molded in. Then they could sell the front bench models either as a sofa/bunk or as a front dinette.
That's my wish as well.
A few weeks ago I had the front couch out:


I was starting to visualize just how nice a front dinette would be:


But I had a trip planned and I had to put it all back together. I haven't abandoned the idea and will revisit it again some day (hopefully soon).
lisantica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2017, 08:46 AM   #34
Commercial Member
 
Name: Mike
Trailer: Boler13/trillium4500/buro13
Ontario
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPW View Post
This truly shows how we all view things differently. I strongly agree with Floyd on this issue in that I see a side entry as being more conducive to a useful layout. I have been inside at least three Lil Snoozies, and every one of them has seemed cramped to me, perhaps even claustrophobic. The only things I like about the Snoozy are its aerodynamic shape and its full sized bed, although one person has to crawl over the other to get out of bed. I wouldn’t own any trailer with a cassette trailer, and I find a room A/C poking out of the wall to be (as Donna D would put it) fugly. But obviously, some people have other opinions; I would have never had the opportunity to be inside a Lil Snoozy otherwise. Then again, I find Casitas somewhat confining, but I attribute that perception to the fact that the top of my head essentially brushes the ceiling when I walk around inside one. I personally find the interior of an Oliver roomy but uninviting due to sterile, “like a hospital operating room” look. But isn’t that part of the reason that this forum exists......so that we (and we are all different individuals) can share our differing opinions and experiences while relishing our shared preference for molded FG trailers?
The solution to the problem of having a side door or rear door entrance is if someone would design a trailer with both ,oh wait! Someone has its the HC1 and the one thing I can guarantee is with that rear door open you will not feel clostaphoric.
Mikmay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
17 Improvements to my Outback bitsnbytes13 Modifications, Alterations and Updates 3 07-13-2016 11:49 PM
New trailer could use improvements to design Murphy C. Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 8 06-23-2013 07:51 PM
There is no place like home. T-Shirt Design; Nice Egg Design Adrian W General Chat 6 04-21-2011 09:31 AM
bed design/floorplan design Kent I General Chat 2 08-22-2008 01:31 PM
Pictures of Improvements made Gerry Modifications, Alterations and Updates 6 11-02-2006 04:56 AM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.