Weight Issue - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-10-2010, 09:22 PM   #1
Member
 
Trailer: 1977 Trillium 13 ft
Posts: 30
I had my 1977 Trillium 1300 weighed yesterday. I was both surprised and very concerned. The scale attendant told me it weighed 690 kg or 1521 lbs.

A document at www.trilliumrv.com/Service.htm says that "Vintage" Trilliums weigh about 1000 lbs for the 1300 model. Specifications shown on the label on the cupboard door says that the GTW is 1500 lbs. I exceed the GTW on a trailer that is almost empty!

When weighed, the only "extras" in/on the trailer were the battery, a full LP tank, 4 small leveling boards, awning and poles. Brakes were recently added so there is the weight of the drums and shoes to consider.

I didn't weigh these individual items but surely they can't account for the 521 pounds above the 'dry' weight, can they? I will have the trailer weighed somewhere else in case the first place I went to made an error.

My question to the group is ... what's wrong here? Am I missing some information that some of you may have?

Also have had trouble finding a public scale to have my unit weighed. The place I went to yesterday was a recycling depot. Also suggested was one of the scales found on the highway that checks that trucks are not over-weight. Other than these, does anyone know of a public scale in the Hamilton/Burlington/Oakville area (of Ontario).

Thanks all, Clark
Clark Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 09:41 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Chester Taje's Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 4,897
I beleive that lots of these 13ft trailer are heavier than what is posted.You are probably very close to true weight.
__________________
Retired Underground Coal Miner.
Served in Canadian Army (1PPCLI)
Chester Taje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 10:03 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Roy in TO's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1972 Boler American and 1979 Trillium 4500
Posts: 5,141
Dixie Rd. just N of the 401 on the west side.

Some people have mentioned that the roadside scales are sometimes left on even though the inspection stations are closed. Check around your area for landscape places etc. that may have their own scales on site.

Many of these trailers are heavier than were advertised back in the 70's. My understanding is that the weights stated were for an empty basic trailer before anything was installed.

The thread "Trailer Weights...What are They Really?" should give you some idea of other trailers that have been weighed.

Then again you can do a search for +1300 +Weigh* which should give you some idea of what others are reporting
Roy in TO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 10:20 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
paulw's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17 ft
Posts: 418
Registry
When I bought my 1995 Scamp 16 from the previous owner, he gave me the original factory invoice for it listing the weight as 1450#.
On the way home I stopped at a highway scale do see what it really weighed. I wasn't too surprised when it was around 1900# empty.
If it ever weighed 1450, it was before they put the interior, bathroom and appliances...
I wasn't surprised because I used to have a 10' teardrop that weighed 1350# (loaded for a trip) the first time I bothered to weigh it
__________________
Paul & Norma
2005 Hunter Fat Shadow, 1995 Scamp 16, 2009 Escape 17B, 2013 Escape 21
2022 Coachmen Nova 20C
paulw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 06:51 AM   #5
Member
 
Trailer: 1977 Trillium 13 ft
Posts: 30
Thanks Chester, Roy and Willar for your feedback. And Roy, based on the thread you referred me to, the weight of mine is very similar to a lot of others. So the 1521# is probably accurate.

This raises an interesting question. If many of our trailers weigh more than advertised and the actual empty weight is close to or exceeds the GTW, it seems we risk stressing the trailer's frame, axle, etc ... unless the advertised GTW is also artifically low. Has anybody researched this aspect of the problem? Or are you just loading lightly and taking a risk?

Clark

Clark Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 09:29 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Roy in TO's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1972 Boler American and 1979 Trillium 4500
Posts: 5,141
Clark,

I'm not an engineer, just a common sense kind of guy. Many of our trailers are 30 some odd years old. We all load up to camp without serious problems. If there were problems, I doubt many of our trailers would still be on the road.

Each type of trailer has its weak spots in the frame. The Trillium 1300 was recalled to weld gussets at the bend where the frame comes out from the body up to the A frame. The bolers have their own weak spots.

When we replace our axles, we tend to upsize them up to reality. Most replace a 1200# or so axle with a 2200# one. If we use our trailers for camping and pack appropriately we seem to get by sans problems. OTOH I would not dream of using my trailer as a utility trailer.

My take on all of this is that the weights back in the day were more of a marketing ploy. My suggestion is to take the "advertised" spread in weights on yours (gross allowable - trailer weight) to use as a guide as to how much gear to pack. Most the little trailers fall in the range of 350-500#. That's a lot of gear.
Roy in TO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 09:36 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Chester Taje's Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 4,897
Quote:
Thanks Chester, Roy and Willar for your feedback. And Roy, based on the thread you referred me to, the weight of mine is very similar to a lot of others. So the 1521# is probably accurate.

This raises an interesting question. If many of our trailers weigh more than advertised and the actual empty weight is close to or exceeds the GTW, it seems we risk stressing the trailer's frame, axle, etc ... unless the advertised GTW is also artifically low. Has anybody researched this aspect of the problem? Or are you just loading lightly and taking a risk?

Clark
I think Roy in TO said it best
__________________
Retired Underground Coal Miner.
Served in Canadian Army (1PPCLI)
Chester Taje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 09:45 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Alf S.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 19 ft Escape 5.0 / 2002 GMC (1973 Boler project)
Posts: 4,148
Registry
Send a message via Yahoo to Alf S.
Hi: Clark Martin... There's always "Slim Fast"
Alf S. North shore of Lake Erie
Alf S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 10:12 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Raya's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1974 Boler 13 ft (Neonex/Winnipeg)
Posts: 3,008
Another thing to think about on the axle rating: The weight of the axle, rims, brakes and tires is not "live" weight on the axle, and neither is the tongue weight.

If your trailer is, say, 1800# loaded, then your tongue weight is around 200#, and although I don't know how much the running gear weights, I would think it might be at least another 150#? That would make the actual live load on your axle 1450#.

I agree that in general, many of our trailers weigh perhaps 50% more than claimed by the builder. Those 1000# eggs seem to be a myth for the most part.

Raya
Raya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 10:16 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Larry&Carrie's Avatar
 
Trailer: 13 ft Scamp 1983 and 1972 Compact Jr (project)
Posts: 554
Send a message via MSN to Larry&Carrie
Talking

YUP--- that sounds about right... Both my Compact Jr and Scamp 13' come in right around 1600# loaded.. That's with food, clothes, approx 5 gal water, one propane tank, no battery. (no brake setup on either). I did reinforce both frames when I ran them thru my shop. The Scamp had some problems in the tongue area, Compact did not. But, shucks, what does one expect for a 30 year old trailer? (almost 40 in the Compact's case). I did put a 2200# rated axle under the Scamp during the upgrade. And yes the low weight was a marketing ploy...... And I think it had something to do with some states requiring brakes on trailers weighing over a 1000#..... Larry
Larry&Carrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 10:59 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Robin G's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 Casita
Posts: 3,428
Thankfully Clark there are people like you that actually "get it" and have the moxie to even wonder/weight their trailer. Some of us get nervous when we see people oblivious to the weight issue and are looking to buy a 900 pound trailer to pull behind their Ford Pinto.......................
Robin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 11:26 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Raya's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1974 Boler 13 ft (Neonex/Winnipeg)
Posts: 3,008
Raya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 01:24 PM   #13
Member
 
Paul McEwan's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1976 Trillium 13 ft
Posts: 50
Quote:
Thankfully Clark there are people like you that actually "get it" and have the moxie to even wonder/weight their trailer. Some of us get nervous when we see people oblivious to the weight issue and are looking to buy a 900 pound trailer to pull behind their Ford Pinto.......................
We tend to pack all the extras in the tow van but store them in the trailer.
Paul McEwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 03:37 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Robin G's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 Casita
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
We tend to pack all the extras in the tow van but store them in the trailer.

But that can be just as big a problem for some cause their tow vehicle is not meant to tow over a certain poundage, and for every passenger or the "extra's" their tow capacity goes down so in essence they are over their tow cap anyway and are under the illusion they aren't cause they packed their trailer "lite"..................

That is why it's crucial to know.
Robin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 05:49 PM   #15
Moderator
 
Pam Garlow's Avatar
 
Trailer: U-Haul 1985
Posts: 3,436
Registry
When I weighed my Uhaul, it came in at 950lbs. But it was pretty much stripped clean of all removable items. There was no propane tank, no battery, no furnace, no AC, nor the standard Uhaul solar panel & evaporative cooler.
I stripped it down and then weighed it, just to see if my Ford Focus had any chance of being a tow vehicle....which it did not . So I tow with a van.
Pam Garlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 08:21 PM   #16
Member
 
Paul McEwan's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1976 Trillium 13 ft
Posts: 50
Quote:
But that can be just as big a problem for some cause their tow vehicle is not meant to tow over a certain poundage, and for every passenger or the "extra's" their tow capacity goes down so in essence they are over their tow cap anyway and are under the illusion they aren't cause they packed their trailer "lite"..................

That is why it's crucial to know.
You're right. I'm thinking a tow cap of 5500lb with body on frame van should be enough. It is crucial to know. Mountain passes have not been an issue.
Paul McEwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 10:11 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Robin G's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 Casita
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
You're right. I'm thinking a tow cap of 5500lb with body on frame van should be enough. It is crucial to know. Mountain passes have not been an issue.


Sounds like you got it covered! That's a good thing!
Robin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:32 AM   #18
Member
 
Trailer: 1977 Trillium 13 ft
Posts: 30
Hi all,

Thanks for all comments. I've not upgraded my axle so I think I'll just take a bit of a risk and load as light as possible. As I mentioned, I'm already exceeding the GTW - it's 1500#, my unit is 1521#.

For what it may be worth, I've written to Trilliumrv.com asking them to comment on this issue. While not responsible for decisions made in the 70's perhaps they can provide some useful info. I've asked two questions:

1) Was the advertised GTW of 1500# artificially low to discourage owners from over-loading?
2) How much of a load can I add to the trailer that exceeds the 1500# GTW before I risk stressing axle, frame, etc.?

Clark Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 06:28 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Trailer: Former 1978 Trillium 4500 owner (now 2010 R-pod)
Posts: 235
Hi Clark,

I weighed my previous trailer at the truck stop in Grimsby. I think it cost about $12 or $14. Let me know if I can be of any help with it as I used to drive a truck for a living.

Cheers,

Phil
__________________
77 Trillium 4500
Phil 4500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 12:36 AM   #20
Junior Member
 
Trailer: 76 Trillium 13 ft
Posts: 8
For what it's worth my 76 13' trillium comes in at 650kg (1430lb) without any of our stuff in it. It is, however, equipped with a furnace, 3 way fridge, two 20lb propane tanks, and battery. Once we add food, sleeping bags, beer, and cooking supplies it tips the scales at 1700lb. My Volvo has a 2000lb tow capacity, on flat land it slows down highway acceleration but otherwise is dreamy. In the mountains there is a small struggle uphill but otherwise no major concerns.
Tim Bas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
weighing, weight


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
solar issue cyndi H Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 31 08-21-2008 10:19 AM
Tongue Weight Issue??? Dave Mc Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 3 05-20-2008 08:45 PM
carpeting issue... Rarebird Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 2 12-04-2006 06:34 PM
Battery Issue (?) Tirah Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 11 07-21-2006 12:08 PM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.