|
10-28-2011, 10:08 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Name: Noel
Trailer: 1979 13' Boler
British Columbia
Posts: 79
|
Battery Box on Back Bumper
I'm thinking of having a metal box welded onto the back bumper of our 13' Boler, to hold two 6 volt golf cart batteries, instead of having a 12 volt battery on the tongue.
Has anyone done this type of mod before?
Any thoughts as to pros and cons?
My wife wonders about problems that may occur in the event of a rear end collision.
Thanks,
Noel & Grace
|
|
|
10-28-2011, 10:52 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Toyota Sunrader and 16 ft Scamp
Posts: 975
|
I would wonder, worry, about that much weight so far behind the axle.
It will probably counter act any and all tongue weight and put you in a very dangerous situation.
John
|
|
|
10-28-2011, 11:10 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Name: David
Trailer: 16 foot Scamp
Arizona
Posts: 323
|
Probably not the best idea. Golf cart batteries are really heavy but they do work well. If you crush the case in an accident you will have acid leaking. I think I would build a pretty secure tube cage to protect them. As mentioned though make sure your hitch weight bias is not going to be upset.
|
|
|
10-28-2011, 11:26 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 7,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Dwarf
I'm thinking of having a metal box welded onto the back bumper of our 13' Boler, to hold two 6 volt golf cart batteries, instead of having a 12 volt battery on the tongue.
Has anyone done this type of mod before?
Any thoughts as to pros and cons?
My wife wonders about problems that may occur in the event of a rear end collision.
Thanks,
Noel & Grace
|
It's simple, reduce your power needs then the small battery on the tongue will work just fine.
__________________
Byron & Anne enjoying the everyday Saturday thing.
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 12:52 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Toyota Sunrader and 16 ft Scamp
Posts: 975
|
Byrons right, reduce you power needs.
I should have suggested for less that $300.00 dollars including battery you can put a 50w solar panel on the roof, hook it to a deep cycle group 27 battery you should have all the power you need.
I've installed this same system on 3 trailers now and have never ran out of power.
John
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 07:29 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Trillium 2010
Posts: 5,185
|
I believe Escape put the battery on the rear bumper on the 17' to reduce tongue weight.
You could measure your tongue weight with a bathroom scale and then add weight to the bumper to see what happens. Bear in mind your trailer is like a see saw with the axle the fulcrum. You don't want the tongue leaving the ground. Raz
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 10:19 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Name: David
Trailer: 16 foot Scamp
Arizona
Posts: 323
|
I believe the rule of thumb is 10% of the trailer weight on the tongue. 2,000lb trailer needs 200 on the tongue. Indiviual trailers may need some adjustment. It's better to err to the heavy side though. Being a little heavy just loads the tow vehicle more. Being light can produce an unsafe towing condition.
The need for more battery is dependant on the situations you camp under. I'm a power miser with LED lights, and no heavy draw items. I could definitely use dual batteries primarily for the furnace in winter and fans in the summer. Solar panels in the Pacific Northwest aren't very efficient most of the year. You could probably install them upside down and not know difference . Parking under shade in the summer doesn't do much for them either. My only holdback on the second battery is that I hate to add weight to the trailer. I carry the little 1000w Honda generator to keep things going.
David
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 11:09 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 7,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidSo
I believe the rule of thumb is 10% of the trailer weight on the tongue. 2,000lb trailer needs 200 on the tongue. Indiviual trailers may need some adjustment. It's better to err to the heavy side though. Being a little heavy just loads the tow vehicle more. Being light can produce an unsafe towing condition.
The need for more battery is dependant on the situations you camp under. I'm a power miser with LED lights, and no heavy draw items. I could definitely use dual batteries primarily for the furnace in winter and fans in the summer. Solar panels in the Pacific Northwest aren't very efficient most of the year. You could probably install them upside down and not know difference . Parking under shade in the summer doesn't do much for them either. My only holdback on the second battery is that I hate to add weight to the trailer. I carry the little 1000w Honda generator to keep things going.
David
|
True on the solar panels in Pacific Wet Coast. However, there's more sunshine than is often thought. I made a frame for my solar panel and have several extension cords (not house old cords) so I can usually find a place in the sun for the panel. Earlier this year I went for about 3 days without recharging a group 24, 80 amp hour battery with the temperatures in the low teens to single digits. A bit warmer and LED lights I can go longer.
__________________
Byron & Anne enjoying the everyday Saturday thing.
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 12:21 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2008 Casita 17 ft Spirit Deluxe
Posts: 2,020
|
Raz,
Comparing a 17' to a 13' is apples and oranges. My 17' Casita tongue weighs 400 lbs, so I can get away with a lot more weight on the stern than any 13' trailer could ever add without poor handling consequences. First, my axle is situated further back from the tongue than a 13 footer, which serves to lessen the moment arm, (or fulcrum point, from the axle to the hitch.) Think of it as a 13 footer being a well-balanced see-saw. The 17' will definitely be more weight biased towards the tongue due to the already greater distance between the tongue and the centerline of the axle. The 13' has a much shorter wheelbase making it much more susceptible to handling problems attributable to any front-to-rear weight shifting than a heavier and longer 17' trailer.
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 01:03 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Trillium 2010
Posts: 5,185
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casita Greg
Raz,
Comparing a 17' to a 13' is apples and oranges. My 17' Casita tongue weighs 400 lbs, so I can get away with a lot more weight on the stern than any 13' trailer could ever add without poor handling consequences. First, my axle is situated further back from the tongue than a 13 footer, which serves to lessen the moment arm, (or fulcrum point, from the axle to the hitch.) Think of it as a 13 footer being a well-balanced see-saw. The 17' will definitely be more weight biased towards the tongue due to the already greater distance between the tongue and the centerline of the axle. The 13' has a much shorter wheelbase making it much more susceptible to handling problems attributable to any front-to-rear weight shifting than a heavier and longer 17' trailer.
|
I wasn't comparing anything. The original post asked if any one had put the battery on the back bumper. I was answering his question. Please read my post again as I think I mentioned the see saw fulcrum analogy when I suggested he measure his tongue weight.
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 02:12 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Escape 17 ft Plan B
Posts: 2,388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by P. Raz
I believe Escape put the battery on the rear bumper on the 17' to reduce tongue weight.
You could measure your tongue weight with a bathroom scale and then add weight to the bumper to see what happens. Bear in mind your trailer is like a see saw with the axle the fulcrum. You don't want the tongue leaving the ground. Raz
|
My Escape 17B has a pair of 6V batteries on the rear bumper (factory installed along with a 90 watt solar panel). The dual propane & exterior storage bin on the tongue still provide plenty of tongue weight.
|
|
|
10-29-2011, 08:41 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Name: Noel
Trailer: 1979 13' Boler
British Columbia
Posts: 79
|
Thanks for all the info - I guess I'm gonna have to do a bit more thinking about power needs and tongue weight.
I've been thinking about going the solar charger route, so perhaps that's money better spent.
Noel & Grace
|
|
|
11-02-2011, 04:48 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 1982 Fiber Stream and 2001 Casita Spirit Deluxe (I'm down to 2!)
Posts: 1,989
|
Marv & Mary Watson have a battery box on the rear of their Trillium 1300 and I think Karen K also has one on the back of her 13' Companion.
Neither seem to have any troubles towing due to the box and batteries back there.
I have seen both and they are both amazingly heavy duty welding jobs and are well done it seems.
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 08:46 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Harris
Marv & Mary Watson have a battery box on the rear of their Trillium 1300 and I think Karen K also has one on the back of her 13' Companion.
Neither seem to have any troubles towing due to the box and batteries back there.
I have seen both and they are both amazingly heavy duty welding jobs and are well done it seems.
|
Due to the nature of these little trailers, it must be said that a battery will have a rougher ride on the rear bumper than on the tongue.
While that may not be your deciding factor, it does effect battery life.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Box on the bumper...
|
PaulOWindsor |
General Chat |
49 |
04-27-2012 04:02 PM |
Battery box
|
pindraak |
Modifications, Alterations and Updates |
7 |
02-16-2011 12:59 PM |
Storage Box for Rear Bumper
|
Craig D. Thompson |
Care and Feeding of Molded Fiberglass Trailers |
12 |
09-03-2009 05:22 PM |
Battery Box
|
bonnie w |
Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners |
4 |
05-14-2007 07:22 PM |
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Upcoming Events |
No events scheduled in the next 465 days.
|
|