5th Wheel Scamp - Honda Ridgeline - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-20-2007, 10:20 PM   #1
Member
 
Carl O's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1990 Scamp 16 ft
Posts: 32
5th Wheel Scamp - Honda Ridgeline

Hi,

Quick question: I own a Honda Ridgeline, which I really like, does anyone have any knowledge of a Ridgeline pulling a 5th wheel scamp?

Thanks,

-Carl
Carl O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 10:26 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Benita's Avatar
 
Trailer: Fiber Stream 16 ft 1982
Posts: 608
Send a message via Yahoo to Benita
A 5th wheel voids the Ridgeline's warranties. Honda does not recommend the Ridgeline as a 5th wheel tow vehicle.
Benita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 10:31 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Frederick L. Simson's Avatar
 
Trailer: Fiber Stream 1978 / Honda Odyssey LX 2003
Posts: 8,222
Registry
Send a message via AIM to Frederick L. Simson
Talking

I think the sloping sides of the cargo bed are too high for a 5th wheel type trailer.
__________________
Frederick - The Scaleman
Frederick L. Simson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 10:47 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Gina D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
Registry
I want a Ridgeline!!!

I think the back is indeed too sloped, and the trunk area may make it too difficult to get a hitch in there.
Gina D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 11:23 PM   #5
Member
 
Carl O's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1990 Scamp 16 ft
Posts: 32
Wow, that was fast! I new I came to the right group.

Now that I think about it, with the trunk under the bed and the fact that the bed is not metal but a composite material, it makes sense that it shouldn't be pulling a 5th wheel and I can completely believe that it would invalidate my warranty.

Thank you.

-Carl

p.s. - I'm still looking for my little 13' egg. I was just curious.
Carl O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 12:22 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Taylor Kissinger's Avatar
 
Trailer: 19 ft Scamp (Egg Salad Annie)
Posts: 272
Registry
Quote:
Wow, that was fast! I new I came to the right group.

Now that I think about it, with the trunk under the bed and the fact that the bed is not metal but a composite material, it makes sense that it shouldn't be pulling a 5th wheel and I can completely believe that it would invalidate my warranty.

Thank you.

-Carl

p.s. - I'm still looking for my little 13' egg. I was just curious.
I measure a Ridgeline and there is not enough turning radius. I wrote Honda and asked them when they will build a real truck but not a Monster like everyone seems to be building. Most of the new trucks have side rails that are to high for a standard 5th wheel Scamp < a lift would have to be added.>
Taylor the Sailor
Taylor Kissinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 01:32 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Brian B-P's Avatar
 
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
Quote:
Wow, that was fast! I new I came to the right group.
Yes, although we have discussed this application of the Ridgeline before (when it was new), so the answers were ready-to-go.

Quote:
Now that I think about it, with the trunk under the bed and the fact that the bed is not metal but a composite material, it makes sense that it shouldn't be pulling a 5th wheel and I can completely believe that it would invalidate my warranty.
The composite box is not a problem, just a factor to consider. People pull Scamp 19' trailers with Toyota Tacomas with plastic boxes, using appropriate brackets between the frame and point where the hitch bolts through the box; in practice, this is done for metal boxes as well with heavier trailers.

While I can believe that Honda says the Ridgeline cannot tow a trailer using a hitch in the box, that's probably true of all the compact trucks as well, and they are the trucks which the Scamp 19' and Escape 5.0 are built for. GM says no to fifth-wheel towing with one variation of their full-size pickup trucks; I don't think this has anything to do with whether the configuration is safe for a couple of tons of trailer, but reflects their fear that some owner will hook up a 15,000 lb fifth-wheel to a light-duty truck.

In the end, because of the high box sides and short box, I suspect a Ridgeline would be better suited to a custom gooseneck than any existing RV trailer design.

With a curb weight around 2050 kg (4500 lb) and a GCWR of 4574 kg (10,063 lb), the total of trailer, driver, passengers, and cargo can be no more than 2524 kg (5553 lb); with a normal towing capacity of 5,000 lb, going to a hitch in the bed doesn't buy any capacity, anyway.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:46 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Roger H's Avatar
 
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
And, as another thought, it doesn't actually have a "box" per se. It's a unibody and the "box" doesn't flex independently of the "body", so if there are stresses that a normal frame could handle, the "body" could potentially wrinkle rather than flex.

Roger
Roger H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 03:05 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Brian B-P's Avatar
 
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
To me, it seems that the issues with the unibody are the same as for a conventional trailer hitch. The loads are taken by the structure, not the visible box sides and floor. Attach in appropriate places, and it's not an issue; just like the composite box, it is a factor to consider, rather than a problem.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 03:18 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Roger H's Avatar
 
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
Actually, Brian, they're not. Conventional trucks with ladder frames will take rotational force on the frame and the box actually moves independently of the body. You can see this in it's most extreme form in rock crawling where the frame flex is significant and the directional displacement between the box and body can be a couple of inches; certainly enough to see with the naked eye. That rotational flex will allow a truck with a separate bed to survive a signficantly higher rotational flex over rough roads with a load in the back without damaging either the body or bed. A unibody would remain rigid until it's failure point, and then bend or wrinkle. As a practical matter, you might not see the result much over regular road driving, but I would think that eventually it could potentially lead to metal fatigue of the unibody.

Those rotational forces are allowed by the hitch ball in a conventional travel trailer configuration and aren't transferred to the tow vehicle at all. The Scamp 5th wheel hitch would also transfer less of those forces than a conventional pin and plate 5th wheel; however the torsional weight differential of the 700 lbs 5th wheel hitch weight would still be transferred from side to side of the axle, where it's only a couple of hundred pounds at a point significantly rear of the axle with a conventional travel trailer.

Roger
Roger H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:12 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Gina D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
Registry
Quote:
A unibody would remain rigid until it's failure point, and then bend or wrinkle.
So... it's kinda like.. middle age???
Gina D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:34 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Alf S.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 2007 19 ft Escape 5.0 / 2002 GMC (1973 Boler project)
Posts: 4,148
Registry
Send a message via Yahoo to Alf S.
Hi: "wrinkle." Alf S. North shore of Lake Erie
Alf S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 07:39 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Brian B-P's Avatar
 
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
I wasn't suggesting that a ladder frame and unibody were the same, only that the two hitch configurations could both attach to unibodies, and the box (not the vehicle structure) is irrelevant. In the Ridgeline, all the metal you see is part of the unibody structure, but the composite box liner isn't. Perhaps that wasn't clear.

Yes, Roger, I was assuming roll-axis decoupling at the hitch - even fifth-wheels do that now, and as you mentioned a ball coupler (like the Scamp) certainly does. I agree that the height of the Scamp hitch complicates the situation, but whether that would be an issue for a trailer this light is interesting to consider. In fact, it is even worse than just being 700 lb mounted some distance above the bed; when accelerating the trailer or starting a turn, there's the whole trailer mass to consider - this is a dynamic load issue.

A conventional trailer with the body size of the Scamp 19' would be at least the same weight (at least 2000 lb empty) and would have a tongue weight of at least 200 lb, but more likely 300 to 400 lb when loaded. The 5000 lb trailers which the Ridgeline is allowed to tow will have hitch weights over 500 lb. Scamp lists an empty hitch weight of 400 lb for the 19', and if the hitch weight goes up in proportion as it is loaded the 700 lb value seems reasonable. So we are talking twice as much for the in-bed hitch, but not 700 lb versus 200 lb.

The Ridgeline can only handle a 1550 lb payload (including passengers), so the 700 lb hitch load, with the height and dynamic load considerations, is certainly not something to be taken lightly.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 08:03 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Roger H's Avatar
 
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
Quote:
So... it's kinda like.. middle age???
Xactly!

Roger
Roger H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 04:21 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 8
Honda Ridgeline

Hello Carl,
Did you ever tow a 5th wheel with the Honda Ridgeline?
--Thanks,
nwnoni

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl O View Post
Hi,

Quick question: I own a Honda Ridgeline, which I really like, does anyone have any knowledge of a Ridgeline pulling a 5th wheel scamp?

Thanks,

-Carl
NW Noni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 08:10 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Nobody mentioned the trunk under the bed floor
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 06:24 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Trailer: Casita
Posts: 188
Registry
Send a message via AIM to Dick & Joanne
If you check over on the Escape web site, Reese has examined the Honda and says there is no way he could attach a 5th wheel to it.

Dick
Dick & Joanne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 10:37 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Matt in SV's Avatar
 
Trailer: U-Haul VT16
Posts: 987
Registry
Who says you can't have a 5th Wheel Ridgeline?

His cargo hatch is bigger than my trailer!

Now, seriously, I wonder if this is bogus?:

Honda Ridgeline Fifth Wheel Hitch - JCWhitney
__________________
Planning our next Escape!
Matt in SV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 08:59 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Greg H's Avatar
 
Name: Greg
Trailer: 72 Boler American
Indiana
Posts: 1,557
Wow, I see it but I don't believe it. Do they offer one for a Ford Explorer Sport Trac?
Greg H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 12:41 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg H View Post
Wow, I see it but I don't believe it. Do they offer one for a Ford Explorer Sport Trac?
The Sport Trac is built on a frame and so would offer no more engineering than a pick-up truck. It's under floor storage is smaller and forward by the front of the box. The fenders are fiberglass but I am fairly certain the inside of the box is steel[ not that that would make any difference since it does "Sport" a frame.
If I were to buy a 5er, the Sport Trac would be my first choice, although they don't build them anymore since they redesigned Explorer [Now Unibody] I would have to go back to pre 2006 anyway in order to find a manual trans.

The only concern would be to properly place the hitch for cab clearance on turns.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
scamp


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5th Wheel Scamp Dan Vang Referrals: Molded Fiberglass Trailers 0 04-29-2010 09:02 PM
Casita 17' Spirit/Honda Ridgeline Jack Sanders Care and Feeding of Molded Fiberglass Trailers 1 04-18-2009 05:03 PM
Scamp Trailer Crank Wheel/No Wheel Mitchell Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 6 08-25-2008 11:36 AM
Scamp 5th-wheel - N. Cal. Legacy Posts General Chat 1 08-11-2003 10:40 PM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.