|
|
02-20-2007, 10:20 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Trailer: 1990 Scamp 16 ft
Posts: 32
|
5th Wheel Scamp - Honda Ridgeline
Hi,
Quick question: I own a Honda Ridgeline, which I really like, does anyone have any knowledge of a Ridgeline pulling a 5th wheel scamp?
Thanks,
-Carl
|
|
|
02-20-2007, 10:26 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Fiber Stream 16 ft 1982
Posts: 608
|
A 5th wheel voids the Ridgeline's warranties. Honda does not recommend the Ridgeline as a 5th wheel tow vehicle.
|
|
|
02-20-2007, 10:31 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Trailer: Fiber Stream 1978 / Honda Odyssey LX 2003
Posts: 8,222
|
I think the sloping sides of the cargo bed are too high for a 5th wheel type trailer.
__________________
Frederick - The Scaleman
|
|
|
02-20-2007, 10:47 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
|
I want a Ridgeline!!!
I think the back is indeed too sloped, and the trunk area may make it too difficult to get a hitch in there.
|
|
|
02-20-2007, 11:23 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Trailer: 1990 Scamp 16 ft
Posts: 32
|
Wow, that was fast! I new I came to the right group.
Now that I think about it, with the trunk under the bed and the fact that the bed is not metal but a composite material, it makes sense that it shouldn't be pulling a 5th wheel and I can completely believe that it would invalidate my warranty.
Thank you.
-Carl
p.s. - I'm still looking for my little 13' egg. I was just curious.
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 12:22 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 19 ft Scamp (Egg Salad Annie)
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
Wow, that was fast! I new I came to the right group.
Now that I think about it, with the trunk under the bed and the fact that the bed is not metal but a composite material, it makes sense that it shouldn't be pulling a 5th wheel and I can completely believe that it would invalidate my warranty.
Thank you.
-Carl
p.s. - I'm still looking for my little 13' egg. I was just curious.
|
I measure a Ridgeline and there is not enough turning radius. I wrote Honda and asked them when they will build a real truck but not a Monster like everyone seems to be building. Most of the new trucks have side rails that are to high for a standard 5th wheel Scamp < a lift would have to be added.>
Taylor the Sailor
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 01:32 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
|
Quote:
Wow, that was fast! I new I came to the right group.
|
Yes, although we have discussed this application of the Ridgeline before (when it was new), so the answers were ready-to-go.
Quote:
Now that I think about it, with the trunk under the bed and the fact that the bed is not metal but a composite material, it makes sense that it shouldn't be pulling a 5th wheel and I can completely believe that it would invalidate my warranty.
|
The composite box is not a problem, just a factor to consider. People pull Scamp 19' trailers with Toyota Tacomas with plastic boxes, using appropriate brackets between the frame and point where the hitch bolts through the box; in practice, this is done for metal boxes as well with heavier trailers.
While I can believe that Honda says the Ridgeline cannot tow a trailer using a hitch in the box, that's probably true of all the compact trucks as well, and they are the trucks which the Scamp 19' and Escape 5.0 are built for. GM says no to fifth-wheel towing with one variation of their full-size pickup trucks; I don't think this has anything to do with whether the configuration is safe for a couple of tons of trailer, but reflects their fear that some owner will hook up a 15,000 lb fifth-wheel to a light-duty truck.
In the end, because of the high box sides and short box, I suspect a Ridgeline would be better suited to a custom gooseneck than any existing RV trailer design.
With a curb weight around 2050 kg (4500 lb) and a GCWR of 4574 kg (10,063 lb), the total of trailer, driver, passengers, and cargo can be no more than 2524 kg (5553 lb); with a normal towing capacity of 5,000 lb, going to a hitch in the bed doesn't buy any capacity, anyway.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 02:46 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
|
And, as another thought, it doesn't actually have a "box" per se. It's a unibody and the "box" doesn't flex independently of the "body", so if there are stresses that a normal frame could handle, the "body" could potentially wrinkle rather than flex.
Roger
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 03:05 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
|
To me, it seems that the issues with the unibody are the same as for a conventional trailer hitch. The loads are taken by the structure, not the visible box sides and floor. Attach in appropriate places, and it's not an issue; just like the composite box, it is a factor to consider, rather than a problem.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 03:18 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
|
Actually, Brian, they're not. Conventional trucks with ladder frames will take rotational force on the frame and the box actually moves independently of the body. You can see this in it's most extreme form in rock crawling where the frame flex is significant and the directional displacement between the box and body can be a couple of inches; certainly enough to see with the naked eye. That rotational flex will allow a truck with a separate bed to survive a signficantly higher rotational flex over rough roads with a load in the back without damaging either the body or bed. A unibody would remain rigid until it's failure point, and then bend or wrinkle. As a practical matter, you might not see the result much over regular road driving, but I would think that eventually it could potentially lead to metal fatigue of the unibody.
Those rotational forces are allowed by the hitch ball in a conventional travel trailer configuration and aren't transferred to the tow vehicle at all. The Scamp 5th wheel hitch would also transfer less of those forces than a conventional pin and plate 5th wheel; however the torsional weight differential of the 700 lbs 5th wheel hitch weight would still be transferred from side to side of the axle, where it's only a couple of hundred pounds at a point significantly rear of the axle with a conventional travel trailer.
Roger
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 05:12 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Former Burro owner and fan!
Posts: 9,015
|
Quote:
A unibody would remain rigid until it's failure point, and then bend or wrinkle.
|
So... it's kinda like.. middle age???
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 05:34 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2007 19 ft Escape 5.0 / 2002 GMC (1973 Boler project)
Posts: 4,148
|
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 07:39 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
|
I wasn't suggesting that a ladder frame and unibody were the same, only that the two hitch configurations could both attach to unibodies, and the box (not the vehicle structure) is irrelevant. In the Ridgeline, all the metal you see is part of the unibody structure, but the composite box liner isn't. Perhaps that wasn't clear.
Yes, Roger, I was assuming roll-axis decoupling at the hitch - even fifth-wheels do that now, and as you mentioned a ball coupler (like the Scamp) certainly does. I agree that the height of the Scamp hitch complicates the situation, but whether that would be an issue for a trailer this light is interesting to consider. In fact, it is even worse than just being 700 lb mounted some distance above the bed; when accelerating the trailer or starting a turn, there's the whole trailer mass to consider - this is a dynamic load issue.
A conventional trailer with the body size of the Scamp 19' would be at least the same weight (at least 2000 lb empty) and would have a tongue weight of at least 200 lb, but more likely 300 to 400 lb when loaded. The 5000 lb trailers which the Ridgeline is allowed to tow will have hitch weights over 500 lb. Scamp lists an empty hitch weight of 400 lb for the 19', and if the hitch weight goes up in proportion as it is loaded the 700 lb value seems reasonable. So we are talking twice as much for the in-bed hitch, but not 700 lb versus 200 lb.
The Ridgeline can only handle a 1550 lb payload (including passengers), so the 700 lb hitch load, with the height and dynamic load considerations, is certainly not something to be taken lightly.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 08:03 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Y2K6 Bigfoot 25 ft (25B25RQ) & Y2K3 Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 5,040
|
Quote:
So... it's kinda like.. middle age???
|
Xactly!
Roger
|
|
|
03-14-2011, 04:21 PM
|
#15
|
Junior Member
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 8
|
Honda Ridgeline
Hello Carl,
Did you ever tow a 5th wheel with the Honda Ridgeline?
--Thanks,
nwnoni
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl O
Hi,
Quick question: I own a Honda Ridgeline, which I really like, does anyone have any knowledge of a Ridgeline pulling a 5th wheel scamp?
Thanks,
-Carl
|
|
|
|
03-14-2011, 08:10 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
|
Nobody mentioned the trunk under the bed floor
|
|
|
03-15-2011, 06:24 AM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Casita
Posts: 188
|
If you check over on the Escape web site, Reese has examined the Honda and says there is no way he could attach a 5th wheel to it.
Dick
|
|
|
03-15-2011, 10:37 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Trailer: U-Haul VT16
Posts: 987
|
__________________
Planning our next Escape!
|
|
|
03-16-2011, 08:59 AM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Name: Greg
Trailer: 72 Boler American
Indiana
Posts: 1,557
|
Wow, I see it but I don't believe it. Do they offer one for a Ford Explorer Sport Trac?
|
|
|
03-16-2011, 12:41 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg H
Wow, I see it but I don't believe it. Do they offer one for a Ford Explorer Sport Trac?
|
The Sport Trac is built on a frame and so would offer no more engineering than a pick-up truck. It's under floor storage is smaller and forward by the front of the box. The fenders are fiberglass but I am fairly certain the inside of the box is steel[ not that that would make any difference since it does "Sport" a frame.
If I were to buy a 5er, the Sport Trac would be my first choice, although they don't build them anymore since they redesigned Explorer [Now Unibody] I would have to go back to pre 2006 anyway in order to find a manual trans.
The only concern would be to properly place the hitch for cab clearance on turns.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Upcoming Events |
No events scheduled in the next 465 days.
|
|