|
|
07-17-2013, 01:30 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Name: Conrad
Trailer: Bigfoot 3000 & Barth "slide-in" truck camper
Connecticut
Posts: 958
|
These are interesting. Note there is a load on the back of the coupler. However the interesting thing is the ball rotates on a friction cup and it is entirely silent. I think these would be particularly suitable for small trailers
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 01:50 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
|
I think this might be the most extensive discussion of the Andersen No-Sway Hitch so far in this forum:
http://www.fiberglassrv.com/forums/f...tch-57733.html It has been the subject of much discussion - some quite heated - in other forums.
I agree that it is an interesting design. That load on the back of the coupler is enormous, and is the most negative aspect of the product in my opinion.
As for suiting small trailers, I note that it comes in only one "size", so it is heavier than necessary and probably stiffer than ideal for most FiberglassRV members.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 12:13 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Name: Conrad
Trailer: Bigfoot 3000 & Barth "slide-in" truck camper
Connecticut
Posts: 958
|
I read about it on the Airstream forum. Some people could not grasp the concept that pulling back with the chains put a huge load on the back of the coupler.
I'll check out the other discussion.
I would think this LL hitch could be made lighter for egg campers with light weight TV's.
Welding the bracket on the trailer instead of bolting, lighter weight or shorter chains, cutting away some of the extraneous metal on drop part of the ball mount, perhaps drilling out some of core of the tapered ball.
Has anyone used this with an Eggcamper?
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 12:39 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 7,056
|
I've always had a bit of trouble with the idea of WHD and Friction anti-sway for our small trailers.
A trailer is connected to the tow hitch via a ball and socket designed to move freely is directions. WHD systems stiffens the ball and socket connection, as does anti-sway bars. Additional stresses are transferred to the trailer frame, axle and tires.
My point is if you don't need it, which most fiberglass trailers don't, then using these items can create more problems than the imaginary ones they're supposed to fixing.
__________________
Byron & Anne enjoying the everyday Saturday thing.
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 12:40 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Scamp
Posts: 7,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night Sailor
I read about it on the Airstream forum. Some people could not grasp the concept that pulling back with the chains put a huge load on the back of the coupler.
I'll check out the other discussion.
I would think this LL hitch could be made lighter for egg campers with light weight TV's.
Welding the bracket on the trailer instead of bolting, lighter weight or shorter chains, cutting away some of the extraneous metal on drop part of the ball mount, perhaps drilling out some of core of the tapered ball.
Has anyone used this with an Eggcamper?
|
Airstream trailer are a lot heavier than fiberglass trailers and WHD hitches may be needed. It's never a good idea to compare apples and oranges.
__________________
Byron & Anne enjoying the everyday Saturday thing.
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 12:54 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Escape 17 ft
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron Kinnaman
Airstream trailer are a lot heavier than fiberglass trailers and WHD hitches may be needed. It's never a good idea to compare apples and oranges.
|
Yup. And some fiberglass trailers are heavier than others, and some have more tongue weight than others, and some people tow with a different vehicle than others, which is why you should look at your situation and compare apples and apples.
I use a WDH with my RAV4 and Escape 17B. It improves the ride and makes the combo handle much better than without it.
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 05:45 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Name: Wayne
Trailer: Airstream Sold, Nest Fan
Ontario
Posts: 2,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night Sailor
I read about it on the Airstream forum. Some people could not grasp the concept that pulling back with the chains put a huge load on the back of the coupler.
|
I agree. It is a huge load. Note the Andrsn is not compatible with at least one coupler and that is not mentioned when you buy it from Andrsn. Buyer beware.
Not
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 06:35 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Name: jim
Trailer: 2022 Escape19 pulled by 2014 Dodge Ram Hemi Sport
Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,710
|
I used one with my Escape 19'. You really do not need one of these for most fiberglass trailers as they are designed to shift the tongue weight to the tow vehicle and back to the trailer axles. So unless your t/w is adding too much weight to your tow vehicle it is not needed. The sway control is ancillary to the weight distribution aspect. If sway is an issue then you will need to address that by other means.
__________________
Jim
Never in doubt, often wrong
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 06:42 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Name: Wayne
Trailer: Airstream Sold, Nest Fan
Ontario
Posts: 2,002
|
Note.... By it's nature a basic WDH also firms up the connection at the ball. To some degree it helps keep the TV and trailer in a straight line reducing the yaw effect.
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 07:21 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Class A Motorhome
Posts: 7,912
|
Anyone considering any kind of WDH, esp for a smaller FGRV, should follow the current thread "HELP Frame Cracks", noting that the the previous owner included a WDH with the trailer. IOW: DUH!
When you pull UP on those tension bars, you are pushing that same load DOWN on the trailer frame in the tongue area. Not always a good thing if it wasn't designed/intended for that loading (as are Airstreams)
|
|
|
07-18-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Trailer: Boler (B1700RGH) 1979
Posts: 5,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Miller
When you pull UP on those tension bars, you are pushing that same load DOWN on the trailer frame in the tongue area. Not always a good thing if it wasn't designed/intended for that loading (as are Airstreams)
|
Since this thread is about the Andersen design, I'll note that while a conventional spring bar-based WDH pulls down on the frame with substantial force (several times as much force as the load transferred to the trailer axle) at the end of about two-foot levers, the Andersen instead pulls forward on the trailer with about four times more force than the spring bars (because its levers are half a foot long).
The Andersen is a different structural challenge for the trailer, but still a challenge.
__________________
1979 Boler B1700RGH, pulled by 2004 Toyota Sienna LE 2WD
Information is good. Lack of information is not so good, but misinformation is much worse. Check facts, and apply common sense liberally.
STATUS: No longer active in forum.
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 12:09 PM
|
#12
|
Junior Member
Name: David
Trailer: Looking
Texas
Posts: 12
|
I've seen this hitch and this discussion on other forums several times... probably overkill for an egg and a sceptic as to how much better it works compare to a "traditional" setup.
One common theme for all instances is NO WDH SYSTEM WILL FIX TOWING ISSUES...
If your tow vehicle is to small in the first place I.e. towing a 16' Scamp with a Smart car... no WDH will fix the issue.
If your egg is loaded WRONG - NO WDH WILL FIX THE ISSUE.
As far as putting too much stress on the frame, that's because people are trying to fix tow issues by overloading the spring bars. They should be even with the frame and not curving upwards like I have seen so many do to compensate for tounge weight being too heavy for the tow vehicle.
NO WDH WILL FIX A TOW VEHICLE THAT CANNOT HANDLE WHAT YOU ARE TOWING.
PERIOD
I've seen people selling these and saying things like "I towed this easy with (small 4cyl passenger car here) and didn't have any problems." Well most small 4cyl cars don't have a tow rating because you aren't supposed to tow with them.Just because you can buy a hitch for it, by no means makes it a tow vehicle. You can buy a hitch for a Geo Metro, but I wouldn't tow even a 13' Scamp with it.
You may make it the 1st, 2nd, 3rd... time, but your luck will run out, just a matter of time.
Or solve all your problems and go buy a $3000 hensley.
And seriously, let's not compare an egg to an Airstream... even the smallest ones out weigh most eggs by 1,000 pounds...
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 01:44 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Name: jim
Trailer: 2022 Escape19 pulled by 2014 Dodge Ram Hemi Sport
Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,710
|
Very well said David and welcome to FGRV.....
__________________
Jim
Never in doubt, often wrong
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 02:11 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Name: Norm and Ginny
Trailer: Scamp 16
Florida
Posts: 7,517
|
We have no sway, a light tongue and a relatively light trailer and use an anti- sway bar.
I have seen anti-sway bars that are set up too tight, where it's almost impossible for the trailer to turn a corner, in a sense locking the trailer and tow vehicle in a straight line.
We try to have our anti-sway bar tensioned so the trailer does turn, though one hears an anti-sway bar creaking on sharper turns. The anti-sway bar provides some measure of resistance to motions other than straight line diminishing the possibility of sway and tending to keep the trailer in a straight line.
I like the Andersen set up, probably my tendency to like the new, yet it seems to be a lot of hardware for our trailer and since we have a light tongue not necessary.
Admittedly there are those with heavier trailers that need a W/D hitch, thankfully we don't seem to need it.
__________________
Norm and Ginny
2014 Honda Odyssey
1991 Scamp 16
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 02:30 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Name: Jared
Trailer: 1984 19' scamp
Kansas
Posts: 1,610
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron Kinnaman
I've always had a bit of trouble with the idea of WHD and Friction anti-sway for our small trailers.
A trailer is connected to the tow hitch via a ball and socket designed to move freely is directions. WHD systems stiffens the ball and socket connection, as does anti-sway bars. Additional stresses are transferred to the trailer frame, axle and tires.
My point is if you don't need it, which most fiberglass trailers don't, then using these items can create more problems than the imaginary ones they're supposed to fixing.
|
Agreed, and that Andersen setup scares the hell out of me. The only coupler I would begin to think about using with that would be a bulldog. Liberal greasing would be a must, and hitch wear would be greatly accelerated.
Personally, I wouldn't want to put that much stress on these trailer frames, it seems completely counter intuitive to stop a ball from being able to move.
To measure from the front axle of your rig to the trailer axle, then measure that distance out on a hill and see how much drop you have in the middle, that's how much your trailer frame is trying to hold up the back of your tow vehicle. After seeing how the space between the bed and the trailer changes by several inches with the fifth wheel on hills, I just can't imagine trying to resist it from doing just that.
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 02:46 PM
|
#16
|
Junior Member
Name: David
Trailer: Looking
Texas
Posts: 12
|
Thanks cpaharley2008, sometimes I rant a bit, but this picture is a perfect example of being able to buy a hitch for something that maybe you shouldn't be using as a tow vehicle;
And yet you "can" buy one... "can" and "should" are not the same thing...
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 02:50 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Name: jim
Trailer: 2022 Escape19 pulled by 2014 Dodge Ram Hemi Sport
Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,710
|
and you got the picture posting down the first time, congrats
__________________
Jim
Never in doubt, often wrong
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 02:54 PM
|
#18
|
Junior Member
Name: David
Trailer: Looking
Texas
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpaharley2008
and you got the picture posting down the first time, congrats
|
Lol thanks.
Too bad you aren't related... I work at the Toyota plant in San Antonio, and can get discounts on Toyota vehicles... like an FJ.
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 02:58 PM
|
#19
|
Moderator
Trailer: 2009 19 ft Escape / 2009 Honda Pilot
Posts: 6,230
|
As mentioned in the other thread, I towed my Escape 19 with my Honda Pilot for 4 years before using a WDH, and was not a bit bothered by the little trailer towing nuances I experienced. I decided to try the Andersen WDH as to me it seemed like a better way to go. The difference I feel is that the tow vehicle and trailer do now seem to behave as one, as things have smoothed out a fair bit.
__________________
2017 Escape 5.0 TA
2015 Ford F150 Lariat 3.5L EcoBoost
2009 Escape 19 (previous)
“Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.” — Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 03:15 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Name: Jack
Trailer: '98 BURRO 17WB
Delaware
Posts: 2,548
|
The old photos of 60's sedans with rear wheels removed and the car supported above ground by a WDH hitch head and spring bars attached to the trailer tongue should speak to all those with the slightest engineering experience, preferably before welds break or light gauge tubes kink. The vee-shaped swale, the sunken fill in cross-road utility digs, and the double speed bump present a challenge for a very long, semi-rigid lever comprising both tongue and tow vehicle.
jack
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Upcoming Events |
No events scheduled in the next 465 days.
|
|