Balancing heavy weights behind the axle - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-19-2017, 01:07 AM   #1
Member
 
Name: Jacqueline
Trailer: Bigfoot
British Columbia
Posts: 31
Registry
Balancing heavy weights behind the axle

We would like to put 130 lbs worth of bikes at the back of the trailer using a bike rack that is around 70 lbs. So the total weight of to the back of the trailer is increased by about 200 lbs. Since this weight is added to the back of the axle, the tongue weight is now decreased by at least 150 lbs.

What are some strategies to increase the tongue weight by 150 lbs to counter the rear weights? Simply load cinder blocks towards the front of the trailer and hope that the axle and frame will hold?

Or maybe we shouldn't be loading such heavy weights at the back?
Jacqueline in BC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 02:15 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Borrego Dave's Avatar
 
Name: Dave
Trailer: Casita SD17 2006 "Missing Link"
California
Posts: 3,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacqueline in BC View Post
Or maybe we shouldn't be loading such heavy weights at the back?
+ 10 on that thought . Haven't heard of anyone having any good luck with that much weight on the rear of FG TTs.
Borrego Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 07:26 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Name: Steve
Trailer: 2018, 21ft escape— 2019 Ram 1500 Laramie
NW Wisconsin
Posts: 4,500
Somewhere on this forum are pictures of the ingenious bike rack that Floyd designed and built for the front of his Scamp.
His bike rack solved 2 problems , hauling bikes and not overloading the backend of the trailer
When we camp with our grandkids we put their bikes in the bed of our truck.
I would not cantilever an addition 200 lbs off the back of my trailer.
steve dunham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 10:08 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Name: Michael
Trailer: Trail Cruiser
Alberta
Posts: 825
Careful doing that, you could seriously decrease the stability of your unit. It's much better to add the weight forward of your trailer axle if your unit is strong enough to carry it. Put your bikes in the tow vehicle if possible. Otherwise try to distribute the weight forward and aft of your trailer axle.
Mike_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 10:27 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Unless you have a lot of detailed information and the math ability of a professor, experimentation and observation is really the only way(weigh?) to determine the effects .
Your trailer is not an exact balance scale .
Variables include such things as number of axles and their placement fore and aft. Oddly, tongue attitude has a greater than expected effect on tongue weight.
You might start by weighing the tongue at the right attitude then adding a known weight to the back (such as a family member or a stack of concrete blocks), then observe the tongue weight again.
That might give you a reasonably accurate ratio to work with.

Within reason and capacity, more tongue tongue weight is better than less and a slight down attitude is better than an up.
On tandem axles, level is more important than on singles to accomplish evenly shared weight on both. But for tongue weight,as you lower the tongue you concentrate more weight on the front axle and also shift the balance point forward at the risk of overloading the axle.

Now I am getting confused !!
What was my point?? OH yeah! It was that observation works better than calculation for those with limited information or limited abilities to interpret it.!

Anyway.... My front rack has worked well for me but you must still be aware of tongue weight and the possible need to balance your load, and/or enjoy the effects of increased tongue weight where tolerable.

The good news is that RV trailers once set up and balanced tend to stay balanced, unlike utility trailers.

Hey! how about a rack on each end made from light weight material, then you can distribute the bikes front and rear for balance?
Attached Thumbnails
DSCF0044.JPG   DSCF0045.JPG  

IMG_7915.jpg 1.jpg  
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 10:29 AM   #6
Member
 
Name: abcde
Trailer: noneofyourbusiness
British Columbia
Posts: 54
x10 on don't do this ....

x10 on don't load up the rear of the trailer excessively. If you search YouTube you'll see some pretty graphic demonstrations from Australia on the dangers of overloading a travel trailer aft of the rear axle.

I have a single axle Bigfoot trailer and I would definitely not consider hanging 200+ lbs off the back end. I had to do a full blown emergency stop last summer when some yahoo pulled out of a laneway in front of me and promptly stalled his engine. I was very glad that my tow vehicle (base F150 XLT 4WD) and trailer were well under their weight limits.

You don't mention what trailer you have and what tow vehicle. If you have spare GVW capacity in the tow vehicle I'd load that up first.
__________________
Ritchie
Bigfoot 25B175G 2008 Anniversary Edition
FRL001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 10:43 AM   #7
Member
 
Name: Jacqueline
Trailer: Bigfoot
British Columbia
Posts: 31
Registry
Our trailer is a 17' Bigfoot and the TV is a Tacoma double cab. The bikes can go into the truck bed for now but we are close to the weight limit. The trailer can still take a couple hundred pounds. I guess bikes on the tongue is the way to go!
Jacqueline in BC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 11:08 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Bruce Thomas's Avatar
 
Trailer: U-Haul CT13
Posts: 778
Registry
It shouldn't lessen the tongue weight by 200 because the axle favors the rear...it'll change though...but won't need 200 on the tongue to counter it. If the axle were centered front to rear(and none are)things would be difficult.
Do you remember as a child on a teeter totter what would happen when the chubbier kid slid further towards the light one? Skinny could hold him or her up.
Bruce Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 11:09 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Trailer: Scamp 16 ft Side Dinette
Posts: 1,279
Remember your high school physics?
Think of you trailer as simple lever with the fulcrum (axle) in themiddle.
Measure the distance from axle to the bike rack, and axle to the hitch ball.
For accuracy you can use a plumb bob and make chalk marks on the driveway if it is level. But for this purpose, close is good enough.
Now, what ever weight you add at the back will reduce the weight at the hitch in the inverse ratio of the distances.

You can reduce the effects of the bikes at the rear, by draining the fresh water and grey water tanks, if they are behind the axle. Or by shifting interior stuff forward.
Wayne Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 11:51 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Jon in AZ's Avatar
 
Name: Jon
Trailer: 2008 Scamp 13 S1
Arizona
Posts: 11,925
Registry
I vote to keep them in the bed of the truck. First it is kindest to the bicycles- less bouncing and they're up and away from road spray. Second, it is lighter and simpler- no heavy rack required, just a fork mount. Third, it's convenient- allows you to park the trailer and take the bicycles to another location for riding.

Putting them on a tongue rack isn't the answer if you're already close to the payload rating of your truck. The extra weight on the tongue is centered on the ball, which is well behind the rear axle of the truck. The lever effect means it will affect the rear axle load more than the same bicycles, minus the heavy rack, in the bed over the axle.

A bike rack on the back is potentially bad for stability, requires shifting other weight forward, and adds a lot of dead weight (receiver hitch and rack) beyond the weight of the bicycles themselves. They're more likely to get banged up and dirty back there, too.

Splitting them is a good suggestion, but double the trouble and expense.

In my opinion, if you're that close to the limits of your truck, the gain you'll achieve by relocating the bicycles to the back or the tongue (or both if you split them) isn't worth the trouble and cost. Better to start planning for a bigger truck in the not-too-distant future.

One other interim alternative not yet mentioned is to put the bicycles inside the trailer over the axle. A number of people have rigged up fork mount systems inside their trailers. It has negligible effect on stability and tongue weight, and it keeps the bicycles out of weather and away from covetous eyes. Your Bigfoot should have enough open aisle space to put at least two inside. Of course, it does make it hard to use the trailer en route.
Jon in AZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 11:55 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
John Linck's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1990 Scamp 16 ft
Posts: 654
I think any such plan to add that much weight to the rear would have to include beefing up the trailer's frame. These frames seem to have enough problems just supporting the camper shell, which is pretty rigid and doesn't load the front or rear unduly since its weight is pretty evenly distributed overall. 200 pounds on the rear is completely different and far out of any design specs. Might be best to remove the whole frame and replace it with a heavier duty model.

Seventy five pound bikes would be difficult to lift very high over the tongue. You might want them low and mount the propane high. You could also carry propane in the TV, though that might make some folks nervous, even if its much safer than gasoline.

Or you could use a van as your tow vehicle and just roll the bikes inside using a narrow ramp.

Good luck, john
__________________
John Michael Linck - Toymaker
Camping since 1960 - Scamp 13' Oak
Subaru Outback 4 cyl cvt
John Linck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 12:16 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Jon in AZ's Avatar
 
Name: Jon
Trailer: 2008 Scamp 13 S1
Arizona
Posts: 11,925
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Linck View Post
...Seventy five pound bikes would be difficult to lift very high over the tongue...
You could always lift the five pound bikes one at a time...

Seriously, my bike and my wife's together weigh less than 60 pounds! Lifting one at a time is no big deal as high as I can reach. But that does raise a secondary point: some bikes are a lot heavier than others. Avoid steel-framed cruiser bikes at all costs!
Jon in AZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 01:07 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
The rack on my trailer is made from a pair of boxfan legs smaller and thinner than 1/2" thinwall conduit. Hardly heavy. Also the full amount is not actually transferred to the ball.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2017, 04:51 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Leobon's Avatar
 
Name: Leonard
Trailer: Bonair Oxygene 2002
Quebec
Posts: 24
On my previous trailer I had 4 bicycles mounted on the rear of a double axle trailer. At low speeds everything was fine but with road irregularities the bouncing around and the seesaw effect created amplified swing. I now have 2 bicycles mounted on the front of my Bonair Oxygen and everything is fine. I must say that my tow (AUDI Q5) is still far from its maximum load.
Leobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2017, 09:02 AM   #15
Member
 
Name: Amy
Trailer: BigFoot
Alberta
Posts: 58
So we have this issue too. We have three bikes and a spare on the back.

We solved it by getting 30lb propane tanks and we do not travel with anything in our tanks for any distance. If we need to take water we get it close to where we are camping.

We also load all food in the fount of the trailer. My rule is nothing rear/behind the sink.
__________________
Amy
1981 Bigfoot B17 Standard
4x4 Toyota FJ Standard 6sp
www.directuganda.com
Mountain Moma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2017, 10:38 AM   #16
Member
 
Name: Vicki
Trailer: Casita 16' Freedom Deluxe
Missouri
Posts: 64
I had a receiver hitch installed on the front of my Ford F150 pickup.
Carry 2 bikes on the bike rack in front of truck.
Works great for me.
GlassCastle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
axle, weight


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Axle Bearings & Tire Balancing Victor Benz Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 15 06-15-2016 10:25 AM
Wheel Balancing jimmied Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 5 02-14-2013 08:23 PM
how heavy is too heavy for top bunk? PattiMurphy Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 2 06-06-2011 03:46 PM
Tire replacement - Balancing Tamid Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 8 10-18-2010 03:54 PM
Hail protection & wheel balancing K Ross Modifications, Alterations and Updates 1 08-06-2009 10:58 PM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.