|
|
08-03-2012, 09:43 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Name: Becky & Dave
Trailer: U haul '82 CT13 & Casita 17' Deluxe
Oregon
Posts: 41
|
Need Tow Vehicle Advice
Just got a 13' 1985 Uhaul. Currently we have a 1/2 ton pickup to pull it but would like something that uses less fuel and is still safe w/enough power.
Is an Outback in the ballpark? I have read a little and understand them to pull better than some mini SUVs like RAV 4, etc...
Can we have brakes put on it and should we? Thanks.
|
|
|
08-03-2012, 09:52 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2007 Casita
Posts: 3,428
|
My suggestion would be to get your trailer all set up to go, then go weight it and all you plan to travel with.
Then when you got a rough idea of the weight, it will be easier to figure out what tow vehicle would be best for your daily and your camping/towing needs. Good Luck!
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 12:06 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Name: Daniel A.
Trailer: Bigfoot 17.0 1991 dlx
British Columbia
Posts: 741
|
Best guess would be your no more than 1500-1600 pounds loaded that's total weight, tongue and trailer giving 200 for the tongue and 1300 for the trailer.
There are many options for you the Outback being one.
I'd be looking for something better in fuel consumption than the truck as well.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 05:45 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Name: Steve
Trailer: 2018, 21ft escape— 2019 Ram 1500 Laramie
NW Wisconsin
Posts: 4,500
|
Total weight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin G
My suggestion would be to get your trailer all set up to go, then go weight it and all you plan to travel with.
Then when you got a rough idea of the weight, it will be easier to figure out what tow vehicle would be best for your daily and your camping/towing needs. Good Luck!
|
Don't forget to add the weight of passengers and added stuff you haul in your tow vehicle for camping such as food , beverages ,screen room, clothing ,chairs, tools , water, etc etc . All of it adds in to your GCVW . I haul my 16 ft Scamp with a 1/2 ton pickup but sometimes when I'm hauling all the things my wife takes along I think I should have a 3/4 ton truck
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 07:19 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 1988 16 ft Scamp Deluxe
Posts: 25,707
|
I'm absolutely WITH Robin. If I was looking to replace my tug (and I'm not), I would want to know precisely what MY trailer weighed... not someone elses. I would be the one making the buy (and possible tug payment) and I couldn't afford to make a financial mistake.
THAT said, think about this... how often will you ACTUALLY go camping? I see you're in Oregon... we have great parks all over the state. How far will you drive each trip? How many trips with your current tug (and higher fuel costs) will it take to EQUAL the expense of a new tug? Somewhere in the future, it makes sense. But unless you're going camping frequently, you may want to reconsider a new purchase.... especially if your truck is paid for. To me, there are always better reasons than just fuel... like needing a daily commuter and only want to have one vehicle, passenger capacity, etc.
__________________
Donna D.
Ten Forward - 2014 Escape 5.0 TA
Double Yolk - 1988 16' Scamp Deluxe
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 08:16 AM
|
#6
|
Junior Member
Name: Dave
Trailer: 19 ft Escape ( aug 2012)
Alberta
Posts: 29
|
We sometimes forget that a bit of extra fuel can be cheaper than changing vehicles, if you are needing or wanting to change tow vehicle anyway its a moot point, but vehicles are expensive and replacing them is ushaualy very expensive. We just sold our old stick trailer and are downsizing to a 19 ft escape and i do plan to down size my tow but it will have to wait for the budget to acomidate it. so we will have a much bigger tow vehicle than we need for a couple of years.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 11:47 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Name: Norm and Ginny
Trailer: Scamp 16
Florida
Posts: 7,517
|
Tow Vehicle
I think the economics of the tow vehicle is in some measure dependent on your trailer use and your wallet.
If you rarely travel and/or need an uneconomical vehicle for farm or work, than a big tow vehicle may be acceptable.
In our case we travel most of the year and an economical tow vehicle pays for itself. For this year we have also travelled well over 20,000 miles and getting 23 mpg is 'wallet significant'.
Our tow vehicle is our only vehicle, another economic advantage. When we're home we just can't justify a an efficient vehicle for everyday driving.
For us the secondary consideration is vehicle reliability. We desire reliability not just because of the cost advantage but because we travel to many truly out of the way places and it's nice not to have to worry about the reliability.
Being retired, the wallet is a consideration. (I'm not crying poverty because we've been on the road for 11 years and spent a considerable sum of money however we are careful and try to be as efficiant as possible.)
__________________
Norm and Ginny
2014 Honda Odyssey
1991 Scamp 16
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 01:01 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 93 Burro 17 ft
Posts: 6,024
|
Most Subaru models would make a good tug for your trailer. Plenty of people use them to tow little eggs. A Rav4 would also be good, and with the v6 it would have more power but still very good fuel economy.
About brakes, if your axle has brackets on either side where the brakes can be mounted, then yes you can add them. If not, a new axle with brakes could be your answer (figure maybe $700 roughly for that).
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 02:48 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 92 16 ft Scamp
Posts: 11,756
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Magee
Most Subaru models would make a good tug for your trailer.
|
I agree with Mike as someone who has towed with an Outback for 5 years. You will not be disappointed with its ability not only at towing but as an everyday ride. As others have said though it is *really* important to confirm what your actual trailer ways before making decisions as to any tug.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 05:10 PM
|
#10
|
Junior Member
Name: Charlie & Sherry Tubbs
Trailer: 2008 Casita Spirit Deluxe 17'
Ohio
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Magee
Most Subaru models would make a good tug for your trailer. Plenty of people use them to tow little eggs. A Rav4 would also be good, and with the v6 it would have more power but still very good fuel economy.
About brakes, if your axle has brackets on either side where the brakes can be mounted, then yes you can add them. If not, a new axle with brakes could be your answer (figure maybe $700 roughly for that).
|
Mike could you tell me if you have transmission cooler on your Outback
I have a 2012 Outback overdrive and manual.
Thanks, Charlie
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 05:28 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2007 Casita
Posts: 3,428
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel A.
Best guess
|
Why guess? Weight it! Then you know exactly!
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 06:44 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Name: Sherman
Trailer: 1978 Trillium 4500
Pennsylvania
Posts: 34
|
Where do you go to get trailers weighed?
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 06:53 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Name: Derek
Trailer: 1973 boler 13', Earlton On
Ontario
Posts: 396
|
Our '06 Subaru Forester is rated for 2400lbs with trailer brakes. This is pretty good for a crossover. The 2009 Forester is now a mid-sized SUV.
Some of the truck diesel fuel stops have scales. In some places, the highway truck scales are left on when there is nobody there to enforce the rules.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 07:09 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2005 16 ft Scamp Side Dinette and 2005 Fleetwood (Coleman) Taos pop-up / 2004 Dodge Dakota QuadCab and 2008 Subaru Outback
Posts: 1,227
|
Our 08 4 cyl Outback with automatic and extra trans cooler (don't know if the trans cooler is needed but it's extra insurance for my mind) is rated at 2700 lbs and pulls our 16' Scamp nicely. The only issue is that the tongue weight limit imposed by Subaru is 200 lbs and you have to be creative to keep the tongue that light.
I read that the 2013 Ford Escape with the 2.0 litre Ecotec 4 cyl engine is rated to pull 3500 lbs so that might be a good TV also.
I weighed mine at a CAT scale and the first weigh costs about $12, and a reweigh is only $1, so you can weigh everything empty, and then weigh again loaded to see the difference.
__________________
Dave (and Marilyn who is now watching from above)
Sharpsburg, GA
04 Dodge Dakota V-8, 17 Dodge Durango V-6, 19 Ford Ranger 2.3 Ecoboost
radar1-scamping.blogspot.com
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 07:38 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Name: Daniel A.
Trailer: Bigfoot 17.0 1991 dlx
British Columbia
Posts: 741
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin G
Why guess? Weight it! Then you know exactly!
|
Yes you know exactly for one trip !!!!!!
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 07:44 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 93 Burro 17 ft
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie H. Tubbs
Mike could you tell me if you have transmission cooler on your Outback
I have a 2012 Outback overdrive and manual.
Thanks, Charlie
|
I don't have an Outback, sorry. Mine is a '08 Highlander... same V6 as the Rav.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 08:15 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 2008 Oliver Legacy Elite
Posts: 904
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin G
My suggestion would be to get your trailer all set up to go, then go weight it and all you plan to travel with.
Then when you got a rough idea of the weight, it will be easier to figure out what tow vehicle would be best for your daily and your camping/towing needs. Good Luck!
|
I wish we had a "like" button here, as we do on facebook.
Good advice, Robin.
Sherry
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 08:54 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Name: Daniel A.
Trailer: Bigfoot 17.0 1991 dlx
British Columbia
Posts: 741
|
Trailer weights in the real world thread.
_13_____U-Haul_____CT13_________1260_____180_____1440
_13_____U-Haul_____CT13_________1400_____150_____1550
_13_____U-Haul_____CT13_________1400_____160_____1560
Now of course if the 100 pounds will put you over the top then a smart car is not the way to go.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 09:25 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Trailer: 92 16 ft Scamp
Posts: 11,756
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel A.
Trailer weights in the real world thread.
_13_____U-Haul_____CT13_________1260_____180_____1440
_13_____U-Haul_____CT13_________1400_____150_____1550
_13_____U-Haul_____CT13_________1400_____160_____1560
Now of course if the 100 pounds will put you over the top then a smart car is not the way to go.
|
LOL based on the numbers above it looks like the Outback depending on which model was purchased would give them between 1200lbs and 1500lbs of extra wiggle room.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 09:45 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Name: Daniel A.
Trailer: Bigfoot 17.0 1991 dlx
British Columbia
Posts: 741
|
Clearly they will need a bigger trailer. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Upcoming Events |
No events scheduled in the next 465 days.
|
|