Towing with a Subaru Forester - Page 3 - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-24-2015, 02:17 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
honda03842's Avatar
 
Name: Norm and Ginny
Trailer: Scamp 16
Florida
Posts: 7,517
I'm with the get brakes group. With trailer brakes you can stop sway by activating just the trailer brakes. Fortunately it rarely happens but it's the fastest way to stop it if it ever happens.

Of course the real way to stop sway is a properly loaded trailer (and reasonable speeds).
__________________
Norm and Ginny

2014 Honda Odyssey
1991 Scamp 16
honda03842 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 03:09 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
dleverton's Avatar
 
Name: Doug
Trailer: Trillium
California
Posts: 246
Registry
I'm with the get brakes group too. They are inexpensive and easy to install. As a much younger person I put on a lot of miles towing rally cars on trailers ~3000 lb behind small tow vehicles much lighter than my Subi Forester and got away with it. Now I prefer the reduced stopping distance the trailer brakes afford. It is safer, no question.
__________________
Doug
dleverton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 03:20 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleverton View Post
I'm with the get brakes group too. They are inexpensive and easy to install. As a much younger person I put on a lot of miles towing rally cars on trailers ~3000 lb behind small tow vehicles much lighter than my Subi Forester and got away with it. Now I prefer the reduced stopping distance the trailer brakes afford. It is safer, no question.
Of course "inexpensive" is subjective as is "safer" in this case.
6 to 8 hundred dollars can put a dent in a lot of ordinary budgets.
Belt and suspenders is fine... but on coveralls?
Still, I guess you don't wanna get caught with your pants down!
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 04:22 PM   #44
Sid
Senior Member
 
Sid's Avatar
 
Name: Sid
Trailer: Parkliner 2014
Wisconsin
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by honda03842 View Post
I'm with the get brakes group. With trailer brakes you can stop sway by activating just the trailer brakes. Fortunately it rarely happens but it's the fastest way to stop it if it ever happens.

Of course the real way to stop sway is a properly loaded trailer (and reasonable speeds).
I'm in agreement with Norm here all the way up to the last sentence. As I can attest to from a recent experience even if you do all that you can do that is within your power for a safe tow you are never in control of what is around the bend or down the road. I will always sign up for one more line of defense/safety for when the unexpected happens.
Sid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 05:05 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Some here make it sound as if choosing not to add brakes makes you anti-brakes or worse , demonstrating a careless disregard for your safety and the safety of others.

Have any of you even SEEN a PlayPac?
It actually weighs LESS than the cargo capacity of my Ranger.
My Ranger and a well equipped Scamp13 together weigh less than its contemporary 4WD Explorer by itself...with the same brakes.
Small utility trailers almost never have brakes, Same is true of Car dollies.


A driver may not be in control of what may be around the bend or down the road, but he is in control of his reaction to it.
Whether towing or not you need to be aware of your rig's capabilities and drive within them, trailer brakes or not.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 07:34 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
dleverton's Avatar
 
Name: Doug
Trailer: Trillium
California
Posts: 246
Registry
I put new brakes on my trillium for under $300.
__________________
Doug
dleverton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 07:42 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
honda03842's Avatar
 
Name: Norm and Ginny
Trailer: Scamp 16
Florida
Posts: 7,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid View Post
I'm in agreement with Norm here all the way up to the last sentence. As I can attest to from a recent experience even if you do all that you can do that is within your power for a safe tow you are never in control of what is around the bend or down the road. I will always sign up for one more line of defense/safety for when the unexpected happens.
Sid, We had one severe braking situation in 8 years. I was glad I had trailer brakes (and an anti-sway bar). We were on a four lane, non-limited access highway in FL and a brand new Chevy Truck, Crew cab pulled across the highway in front of us and stopped, blocking both lanes. I applied the brakes, smoked the tires, every thing stayed straight. The driver heard the screech and floored it out of the way just in time.

A scary moment, glad I had brakes all around and the anti-sway bar.

Even though you're paying attention, stupid happens, the Chevy driver behaved like a deer.
__________________
Norm and Ginny

2014 Honda Odyssey
1991 Scamp 16
honda03842 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 07:46 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
CampyTime's Avatar
 
Name: Wendy Lee
Trailer: Scamp 13' Standard
New York
Posts: 1,071
Registry
I agree Floyd. And I also agree that some folks attest to things with a rigidity that can make others appear careless or uncaring.

Capabilities and driver control. Staying within those limits. I also do not tow under high speed. Have never pulled my scamp over 60 mph and mostly drive 50 or do. Keep my distance and am constantly searching the road and anticipating other driver error. I do have trailer brakes, but I rely on my rig, know it's capabilities and use my brain. I think this is logical and prudent, and I don't push it. There's nowhere I need to be that requires unsafe measures.


Sent from my iPhone using Fiberglass RV
CampyTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 07:50 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleverton View Post
I put new brakes on my trillium for under $300.
Of course you did, I can do it for $150, but I seriously doubt the PlayPac has backing plates and so I was assuming hiring a new axle installed with brakes. That would have made all the difference.

Do you have a friction anti-sway bar? It is only about $60 and requires minimal skills to install.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 08:22 PM   #50
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by honda03842 View Post
Sid, We had one severe braking situation in 8 years. I was glad I had trailer brakes (and an anti-sway bar). We were on a four lane, non-limited access highway in FL and a brand new Chevy Truck, Crew cab pulled across the highway in front of us and stopped, blocking both lanes. I applied the brakes, smoked the tires, every thing stayed straight. The driver heard the screech and floored it out of the way just in time.

A scary moment, glad I had brakes all around and the anti-sway bar.

Even though you're paying attention stupid happens, the Chevy driver behaved like a deer.
You have shown yourself here to be a Paragon of common sense so consider this more a counterpoint than a disagreement...

My trailer has brakes and an anti-sway bar, yet I have towed many trailers home without either and felt as safe as traffic ever allows.
I can lock the brakes on my Ranger but not on the Escape since it has not(yet?) been modified to eliminate the ABS.
No amount of preparation can anticipate every contingency or prevent every accident. I.E.... You can prevent a deer strike about as well as you can prevent hitting a bird or an insect. (I don't have deer whistles)

Actually picking the right TV tire could make more difference than adding brakes to a small trailer towed by an appropriate sized vehicle.

A tangent example of this discussion is as follows...
Every time someone survives a severe crash, the air bags are credited without hesitation, yet the +-3000 deaths and the countless injuries which are caused by them are almost never attributed because the federal law is structured in such a way as to prevent it.
Only the NHTSA is allowed to make that determination and they almost never investigate airbag deaths. Thus the truth is skewed and a moderately useful product becomes a necessary safety item.

Another example....
Tire pressure monitoring is necessary for safety... yet TPMSs were clearly developed to try and cover driver incompetence and made mandatory.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 04:44 AM   #51
MC1
Senior Member
 
MC1's Avatar
 
Name: Wayne
Trailer: Airstream Sold, Nest Fan
Ontario
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleverton View Post
I put new brakes on my trillium for under $300.
Doug, thnxs for posting. Such a small investment for such a huge safety mod.
MC1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 05:51 AM   #52
Senior Member
 
honda03842's Avatar
 
Name: Norm and Ginny
Trailer: Scamp 16
Florida
Posts: 7,517
"Tire pressure monitoring is necessary for safety... yet TPMSs were clearly developed to try and cover driver incompetence and made mandatory." -Floyd

Floyd,
First, I never find you disagreeable.

Second, in general I'm opposed to most government rules, for them 'ruling' is more important than the rules, and often more important than reason.

As to pressure sensors, I like them, particularly on a single axle trailer where it's more difficult for me to feel what's happening until it's 'totally' happened. That said we've been fortunate and have never had a trailer flat, all have occurred on the tow vehicle.

With or without sensors I keep my eye on the level of the trailer by comparing the trailer's levelness to the Honda's rear window antenna to the latches on the stone guard. Of course since I've never had a flat I don't know if it works..

I do like the ability to know what's happening in the trailer's tires.
__________________
Norm and Ginny

2014 Honda Odyssey
1991 Scamp 16
honda03842 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 09:30 AM   #53
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by honda03842 View Post
"Tire pressure monitoring is necessary for safety... yet TPMSs were clearly developed to try and cover driver incompetence and made mandatory." -Floyd

Floyd,
First, I never find you disagreeable.

Second, in general I'm opposed to most government rules, for them 'ruling' is more important than the rules, and often more important than reason.

As to pressure sensors, I like them, particularly on a single axle trailer where it's more difficult for me to feel what's happening until it's 'totally' happened. That said we've been fortunate and have never had a trailer flat, all have occurred on the tow vehicle.

With or without sensors I keep my eye on the level of the trailer by comparing the trailer's levelness to the Honda's rear window antenna to the latches on the stone guard. Of course since I've never had a flat I don't know if it works..

I do like the ability to know what's happening in the trailer's tires.
When I used the TPMS example I was referring to the TV, Of course TPMS is not required for trailers, where it may actually serve a useful purpose!
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 10:27 AM   #54
Senior Member
 
Trailer:
Posts: 787
When North Americans describe how much better electric brakes with a brake controller in the tow vehicle are, compared to the mechanical overrun brakes used in Europe, I think of these 'do I need to bother with trailer brakes at all?' discussions - I have no doubt that mechanical overrun trailer brakes are a lot more effective than no trailer brakes, even if driver-controllable electric brakes may be the best of all.
Andrew Gibbens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 08:02 AM   #55
Senior Member
 
Name: Dale
Trailer: 2010 EggCamper; 2002 Highlander 3.0L; 2017 Escape 21'; 2016 F-150 5.0L Fx4
Colorado
Posts: 746
After much asking and badgering, I've finally heard from a Subaru "authority" that the newly redesigned 2019 Forester (new global platform, 2.5L engine) will still have the limited 1,500 lb towing capacity (I was hoping they might up it back to the previous 2,400 lb). The Subaru response pointed out something I hadn't heard or thought of before. He said that in other "markets" (by which, I assume, he means in other countries), the average highway speeds are lower, and that allows for a higher towing capacity rating in those "markets". So, somewhere in the towing capacity determination formula is a factor related to expected maximum towing speed. In countries with high posted highway speeds (like 70-75 mph in the U.S.), towing capacity is limited to lower weights compared to countries with slower posted speed limits (whatever countries those are). I guess that makes sense. But I still think it has more to do with Subaru wanting to squeeze very ounce of fuel efficiency out of the Forester and directing people interested in towing to the venerable Outback and even more so to their new, bigger Accent. Just my thoughts....
War Eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 09:30 AM   #56
Senior Member
 
Glenn Baglo's Avatar
 
Trailer: Escape 17 ft
Posts: 8,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Eagle View Post
But I still think it has more to do with Subaru wanting to squeeze very ounce of fuel efficiency out of the Forester and directing people interested in towing to the venerable Outback and even more so to their new, bigger Accent. Just my thoughts....

If that were the case, I'd expect Subaru to do something about the pathetic maximum tongue weight on the Outback.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
Glenn Baglo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 12:15 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
Name: JD
Trailer: Scamp 16 Modified (BIGLY)
Florida
Posts: 2,445
I suspect the SAE testing (voluntary) has had an effect on the ratings.
While they might not actually certify that they meet the specs a disagreement in court might still be influenced.
The J2807 standards also have requirements for the braking performance of the truck-and-trailer combination at its maximum GCWR as well as the performance in handling and towing like the Davis dam road.
redbarron55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 09:19 PM   #58
Member
 
Name: Ron
Trailer: 2004 trillium outback 13ft
Alaska
Posts: 65
Registry
We are happy with our combination of a 2015 forester, cvt transmission towing a 2004 Trillium Outback which weighs around 1850 loaded. We have electric brakes too. Good mileage (20 plus) and good performance. I slow down on steep mountain passes in Colorado, but who doesn’t!
Ak Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2018, 08:20 AM   #59
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,520
Registry
Quote:
Originally Posted by redbarron55 View Post
I suspect the SAE testing (voluntary) has had an effect on the ratings.
While they might not actually certify that they meet the specs a disagreement in court might still be influenced.
The J2807 standards also have requirements for the braking performance of the truck-and-trailer combination at its maximum GCWR as well as the performance in handling and towing like the Davis dam road.
They also use arbitrary tongue weight ratings which are wholly and wrongly based on a percentage of tow rating.

Tongue weight should be based on chassis/hitch strength, acceleration up a grade is irrelevant, and 10% is generally inadequate.
The very premise of J2807 is flawed and it tarnishes the reputation of SAE.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2018, 04:21 PM   #60
Senior Member
 
Name: JD
Trailer: Scamp 16 Modified (BIGLY)
Florida
Posts: 2,445
No they are not arbitrary.
The numbers you are talking about are the low tonuge weights specified for worst case handling tests.
I have posted links elsewhere to the full specifications
redbarron55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2014 Subaru Forester- 1500 lb towing Bobbie Mayer Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 134 03-11-2013 04:30 AM
Anyone towing with a Subaru Forester competitor? Bobbie Mayer Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 50 07-13-2011 05:22 PM
More Subaru Forester Towing Questions Michelle A Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 12 04-04-2009 10:18 PM
Subaru Forester Diesel? Bobbie Mayer General Chat 11 03-07-2009 07:23 PM
towing a 13' burro with a Subaru Forester Pamela H Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 5 07-23-2008 08:15 AM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.