Recommended tow vehicle? - Fiberglass RV
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-05-2010, 06:22 AM   #1
Member
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 55
Hi,

I live in the Chicago area and am looking for a 13' egg in good shape. But first I need to buy a tow vehicle and am wondering if I would do better to buy a TV with 2-wheel drive (front), 4x4 with 2-wheel option, AWD (all wheel drive), or 2-wheel drive (rear). Also, is overdrive an issue? Many thanks for whatever advice you sage folks can share with me.

Rich Morrison
Rich Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 09:16 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Rarebird's Avatar
 
Name: Marjie
Trailer: Trillium 4500
New York
Posts: 267
Hi Rich,
Personally I know we would have been very stuck, several times, if it hadn't been for our AWD Honda Element.
marjie
Rarebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 09:33 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Trailer: 2009 17 ft Eggcamper / Chevy S-10
Posts: 699
Registry
A 2 wheel, rear drive, will generally be rated to tow more weight than front wheel drive or AWD. The AWD is also more complex with more to break down and more expensive to fix if it ever does break down, and the AWD will generally also get worse gas mileage.
I'd still get the AWD if I was going to be doing much boondocking on dirt roads or a lot of snow & ice pulling.
Ray N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 09:34 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Frederick L. Simson's Avatar
 
Trailer: Fiber Stream 1978 / Honda Odyssey LX 2003
Posts: 8,226
Registry
Send a message via AIM to Frederick L. Simson
Talking

A lot of your choices will depend on what kind of regular driving as well as towing you may do. Almost any vehicle rated to tow the weight you expect the Scamp to weigh will be fine, especially if you stay on paved roads. You might want to consider a more robust tow vehicle if you want to use a lot of unpaved roads.

I tow with a front-wheel-drive minivan. I use a Weight Distributing Hitch, so I have to have a 2" (Class III) receiver, even though the van is rated for only 3500 pounds which usually requires only a 1-1/4" (Class II) receiver. They don't make Weight Distribution Hitches that fit in the smaller receiver.

I highly recommend that you actually have the Scamp weighed. Consider that the loaded-for-travel weight will be 25% to 40% heavier than dry unloaded weight, especially if you plan to travel with your water tank(s) full. My 16' Fiber Stream weighs 2500 pounds dry but almost 3300 pounds loaded for a 3 week vacation without water.
__________________
Frederick - The Scaleman
Frederick L. Simson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 01:49 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Donna D.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: 1988 16 ft Scamp Deluxe
Posts: 25,822
I'd say buy the trailer first, then get the tow vehicle. More than once a person has found the absolutely perfect trailer and the best price then found out their brand-new tow vehicle is underpowered and can't handle the weight. You can buy a tug on just about any street corner, but finding that perfect trailer is priceless. In the meantime do your research on tugs and be prepared when the right time comes. YMMV
__________________
Donna D.
Ten Forward - 2014 Escape 5.0 TA
Double Yolk - 1988 16' Scamp Deluxe
Donna D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 02:56 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Raya's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1974 Boler 13 ft (Neonex/Winnipeg)
Posts: 3,007
And as Frederick mentions, the plot thickens if you are going to use the same vehicle as a daily driver.

For example, my car's mileage is much reduced when towing, and I may only get 18 mpg. On the other hand, I can bask in 28 mpg the 95% of the time I'm not towing, so even though I take a "hit" when towing, it comes out better.

If I were buying a vehicle ONLY for towing, and driving something else the rest of the time, my choice might not be the same.

And on and on, which is why until we know more about your exact situation, we can only say "it depends."

Good luck in your trailer hunt

Raya
Raya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 08:39 PM   #7
Member
 
Michelle A's Avatar
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 35
Quote:
Hi,

I live in the Chicago area and am looking for a 13' egg in good shape. But first I need to buy a tow vehicle and am wondering if I would do better to buy a TV with 2-wheel drive (front), 4x4 with 2-wheel option, AWD (all wheel drive), or 2-wheel drive (rear). Also, is overdrive an issue? Many thanks for whatever advice you sage folks can share with me.

Rich Morrison
Subaru Forester?? Ours has worked out well as an all aroun daily driver plus a pretty decent tower.
Michelle A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 10:07 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Brian Van Snell's Avatar
 
Trailer: Escape 13 ft 2010 ('Ladybug') / 2003 Subaru Forester
Posts: 387
Registry
Rich:

I agree with Donna that it is easier starting with the trailer.

We initially looked at a used 13 foot Scamp trailer, then had a look at new Scamp trailers on their website, then discovered Escape trailers, and looked up the many trailer selection threads on the Fiberglass rv forum and the Escape forum. Based on this reading we went to the Escape factory and placed an order for a 13 foot Escape. A month later we had some second thoughts about whether 13 feet would be big enough, and visited one of the forum members who had initially ordered a 13 foot Escape trailer and switched to a 17 foot. The decision on how big a trailer you need is an individual question, for example: How important is it to have a bathroom? How many people do you need to accommodate? In our case, since we already had our 2003 Forester we would need to buy a larger towing vehicle if we wanted a bigger trailer. My wife and I debated the costs and benefits and decided to stick with a 13 foot trailer. We had tented for more than 30 years, so the 13 foot trailer was still a considerable step up for us.

Our 13 foot trailer has a dry weight of about 1400 pounds, and loaded weight will be about 2000 pounds. This is the maximum towing weight for the 2003 Subaru Forester we already owned when we began looking for trailers. Newer models have a towing capacity of 2400 pounds.

While we have only had our trailer a few months and have only been on one camping trip we have been thrilled with our trailer. It is doing everything we had hoped for and more.

It is quite an exciting experience going through the purchasing decision. There are so many choices, and so many NICE choices! If you read the forums you will find that there are enthusiastic supporters for many different brands, and there is an amazing variety. On the fiberglassrv forum there is almost universal agreement that fiberglass is the way to go! Happy hunting!

Brian



__________________
Brian & Maria
2010 Escape 13 "Ladybug"|2003 Subaru Forester|2012 Toyota Highlander
Brian Van Snell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 07:37 AM   #9
Member
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 55

Thank you all so very much. Your responses are extremely helpful. I was thinking of getting my trailer first (after all, that's what I'm really excited about) but haven 't figured out how to get my 'new' Egg home. Of course, you're all correct about the limited availability of these wonderful little trailers. I've already missed out on Bette Hanson's 13' Burro in northern Minnesota. The 12' Contempo in San Diego also looks great but it appears the cheapest shipping I can find to Mt. Prospect, IL is around $2000. I've actually thought about flying to San Diego and buying a tow vehicle there with which to tow the trailer home.

Recently retired with grown children in Florida, I am hoping to take two or three extended sojourns every year, both boondocking and at RV sites. My TV will also be my primary transportation. I've been looking at (on the Web) the Jeep Liberty, Honda Element, Chevy Equinox, Hyundai Tucson and Santa Fe, and Subaru Outback.

I can certainly look for an Egg and a tug concurrently but the point of not waiting to buy the 'right' Egg when it comes along is well taken. I have a bunch of questions about the many choices out there and will post another thread (is that the term?) with those.

Many thanks again. You have inspired me to get moving on my new adventure.

Best regards, Rich Morrison
Rich Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 01:26 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Roger C H's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2009 Trillium 13 ft ('Homelet') / 2000 Subaru Outback
Posts: 2,222
Registry
Talking

Rich,
We just returned from a 6 week trip through WA, OR, CA and AZ with our 13' Trillium. Other then having some problems reserving a camping spot in Phoenix because our Trill is not "self-contained", it worked out wonderfully. Some nights we stayed in campsites ranging in price from $22 to $60 per night, and other times we boondocked in Wal-Mart or Denny's parking lots and even one night in a 'secure wayside' full of 18 wheelers. Of course we didn't have heat in the boondocking spots, because we heat with electricity. We also stayed in relative's driveways some of the time. It really paid to be a genealogist! LOL We were gone from Jan 28 until March 12.
The only thing I would caution about, is be sure to have your normal household bills paid up for the time you will be gone, or you may run into some ridiculous 'late fees' and 'interest.' Also, if you plan to use a credit card, be conscious of when the bill will be due. We ran into a problem with a three week trip to Washington DC last year. The credit card payment for the trip came due so close to our return home that we missed the due date by one day. Luckily we were able to convince the cc company that our good will was worth more than the ridiculously high fees and interest they wanted for that one day.
Our 2000 Subaru Outback pulled the 13' Trilliium without any problem. We weren't able to zip up mountains, but we did get up all of them. And just as important, we got down all of them in good order. We generally drove the truck speed limit, a necessity in CA, and got 19.79 mpg. and this is taking CA Hwy 1 up the coast. A more winding road would be difficult to find!
__________________
A charter member of the Buffalo Plaid Brigade!

Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right.
Roger C H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2010, 12:24 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Herb Sutton's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1999 Casita 17 ft Spirit Deluxe
Posts: 260
Rear wheel drive puts the weight on the driving wheels, only way to go.

If you want some sort of 4wd for winter driving then part time 4wd will be simpler and long term cheaper.
Herb Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2010, 05:34 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Radar1's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2020 Escape 19 (was 2005 16 ft Scamp Side Dinette and 2005 Fleetwood (Coleman) Taos pop-up)
Posts: 1,258
Registry
If you are sure you will either be getting a 13 ft or even just a lightweight 16 ft then the Subaru's are excellent choices. The Outback is rated at 2700 lbs and the Forester is about 2400 or 2500. They have excellent all wheel drive and get good mileage. I pulled my pop-up all the time with my 4 cyl Outback but since I now have a Scamp 16 SD with a lot of options my tongue weight now exceeds the Subaru 200 lb tongue weight limit by 50% so I now use my pickup with the Scamp. If I can get my tongue weight down I wouldn't hesitate to use the Subaru to pull the Scamp.
The 2010 Outback with the CVT trans is larger than earlier models but now gets better mileage than many FWD CUVs. When not towing you get the benefits of AWD, good mileage, and excellent safety.

John
__________________
Dave (and Marilyn who is now watching from above)
Sharpsburg, GA
04 Dodge Dakota V-8, 17 Dodge Durango V-6, 19 Ford Ranger 2.3 Ecoboost
radar1-scamping.blogspot.com
Radar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 03:47 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
floyd's Avatar
 
Trailer: 2004 13 ft Scamp Custom Deluxe
Posts: 8,531
Registry
Donna D has a good point, all 13s are not created equal. there is a broad variation in towability, and weight is only a minor consideration, eventhough you would think it was paramount from what you read on the various forums.
Generally...Any small truck on the market today will comfortably tow any 13 ft fiberglass trailer that is commonly available.
Every trailer has it's advantages such as roominess , lay out, build quality, etc.
But when it comes to towability , Scamp, Boler,Eco and the like are group leaders when it comes to towing ease and natural stability.
I tow a 13 Scamp with both a reardrive Ford Ranger and a front drive Ford Escape.
The Ranger is a reliable workhorse, while the Escape rides and tows smoothly and comfortably and leaves me relaxed after a long day on the road with the Scamp.
A rear drive TV will tow much better with limited slip, In fact that could be generally thought of as the best overall design layout. For the purpose of towing a 13, four wheel or all wheel drive doesn't really add enough to justify the weight or the expense just for a TV.
Remember we are discussing a 13ft. fiberglass trailer, so platform is not as critical as it is on something like a tractor trailer. The smallish SUVs are a great choice for versatility comfort, economy etc. Notice I said smallish, not teensy.
floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 10:11 PM   #14
Member
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 55
Quote:
Donna D has a good point, all 13s are not created equal. there is a broad variation in towability, and weight is only a minor consideration, eventhough you would think it was paramount from what you read on the various forums.
Generally...Any small truck on the market today will comfortably tow any 13 ft fiberglass trailer that is commonly available.
Every trailer has it's advantages such as roominess , lay out, build quality, etc.
But when it comes to towability , Scamp, Boler,Eco and the like are group leaders when it comes to towing ease and natural stability.
I tow a 13 Scamp with both a reardrive Ford Ranger and a front drive Ford Escape.
The Ranger is a reliable workhorse, while the Escape rides and tows smoothly and comfortably and leaves me relaxed after a long day on the road with the Scamp.
A rear drive TV will tow much better with limited slip, In fact that could be generally thought of as the best overall design layout. For the purpose of towing a 13, four wheel or all wheel drive doesn't really add enough to justify the weight or the expense just for a TV.
Remember we are discussing a 13ft. fiberglass trailer, so platform is not as critical as it is on something like a tractor trailer. The smallish SUVs are a great choice for versatility comfort, economy etc. Notice I said smallish, not teensy.
Hi Folks,

I ended up buying a 2006 Kia Sorrento, 3.5L V6, rear wheel drive. I pick up my (new) 12' Contempo Condo trailer, 1375 pounds empty (not yet weighed or verified), Sunday in San Diego. I will tow to Tucson (to visit for a day or two) before deciding about whether to install a transmission cooler and then continue on to Illinois.

Rich
Rich Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 06:48 AM   #15
Moderator
 
Pam Garlow's Avatar
 
Trailer: U-Haul 1985
Posts: 3,440
Registry
Wow, a new tow vehicle too! That's quite the 'accessory' to buy for your new trailer
The first thing I bought for mine was towels.
Pam Garlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:02 AM   #16
Member
 
Trailer: No Trailer Yet
Posts: 55
Quote:
Wow, a new tow vehicle too! That's quite the 'accessory' to buy for your new trailer
The first thing I bought for mine was towels.
Thanks Pam. I needed that. You made me laugh.

Rich
Rich Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 04:04 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Jane P.'s Avatar
 
Trailer: Bigfoot 19 ft
Posts: 721
Exclamation

Quote:
Wow, a new tow vehicle too! That's quite the 'accessory' to buy for your new trailer
The first thing I bought for mine was towels.
New towels for the trailer? Don't you have used ones at home?

The idea is to move your used towels to the trailer and replace them with new ones for your home.

Rich extrapolated on this concept. He bought a new tow vehicle for his future used trailer.

Now that's what I call thinking outside the gift wrap.
__________________
'02 Bigfoot 21’ | '07 Chevy Tahoe
Jane P. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 01:36 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Bud Kennedy's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1984 U-Haul / 02 Mazda pick up
Posts: 174
We currently pull our 13' U-haul with a 1998 Nissan Quest. It has a 3 liter V6 and pulls the trailer ok even though the acceleration is not so great up hill. However we think it is adequate for our needs considering the gas milage (15 when it's hilly). The down side is it has an automatic transmission.

I have always hated automatics and have never owned one that didn't crap out on me. In addition, I can easily rebuild a manual tranny ( that seldom fails ) with ordinary tools in short order. NOt so with an auto.

Therefore we are looking at a 1999 Ford V6 3L. XLT 4x4 with a manual tranny. We invite any and all comments regarding the suitability of this Ford ranger as a TV.
Bud Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 05:20 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Ian-Vicki's Avatar
 
Trailer: 17 ft Burro Widebody / 2007 Ford Ranger
Posts: 470
we tow with an 07 XLT 4-litre 4x4 standard and have had no issues pulling our 17 Burro. However the standard has a tow rating 2000 lbs less than the auto, which tells me ford thinks the ford/mazda clutch assembly is poor, or that it doesn't want to warrantee the folks who shift for themselves. we live where there are a lot of hills and while we know the Burros is there, we're in no rush, and there's no worries about keeping up on the interstate. That sucks the gas though.
cheers
Ian
Ian-Vicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 05:31 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Bud Kennedy's Avatar
 
Trailer: 1984 U-Haul / 02 Mazda pick up
Posts: 174
Ian, how far does a gallon take you?
Bud Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manitoba Boler requires axle replacement. Recommended Shops? Tom and Colleen Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 7 10-08-2014 08:31 AM
Recommended Route, Glacier to Vancouver? Parker Buckley Camping, Campout Reports 14 07-30-2010 09:00 AM
Recommended Laptop, Accesories and Programs? Cam A General Chat 76 06-15-2008 05:14 PM
Tow vehicle Steven F Problem Solving | Owners Helping Owners 7 01-09-2006 06:49 PM
Tow Vehicle Legacy Posts Towing, Hitching, Axles and Running Gear 5 08-10-2003 12:12 AM

» Upcoming Events
No events scheduled in
the next 465 days.
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.